Skip to content

Codecov ignoring /tests and /samples #22

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 1, 2024

Conversation

hallvictoria
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.35%. Comparing base (ad5a21c) to head (8998130).

❗ Current head 8998130 differs from pull request most recent head d60a687. Consider uploading reports for the commit d60a687 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev      #22      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.64%   96.35%   -1.30%     
==========================================
  Files          12        8       -4     
  Lines         382      329      -53     
  Branches       23       89      +66     
==========================================
- Hits          373      317      -56     
  Misses          8        8              
- Partials        1        4       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 96.35% <100.00%> (-1.30%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@hallvictoria hallvictoria marked this pull request as ready for review March 29, 2024 19:37
@hallvictoria hallvictoria merged commit 387f907 into dev Apr 1, 2024
@hallvictoria hallvictoria deleted the hallvictoria/code-coverage-fixes branch April 1, 2024 14:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants