Skip to content

Add tests for xoptions #109

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 21, 2024
Merged

Conversation

tharun571
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 62.66%. Comparing base (48a14c3) to head (e9dd6d7).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #109      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   59.83%   62.66%   +2.83%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines         600      600              
  Branches       59       59              
==========================================
+ Hits          359      376      +17     
+ Misses        241      224      -17     
Files Coverage Δ
include/xeus-cpp/xoptions.hpp 100.00% <ø> (+100.00%) ⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Files Coverage Δ
include/xeus-cpp/xoptions.hpp 100.00% <ø> (+100.00%) ⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

Copy link
Contributor

@vgvassilev vgvassilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@vgvassilev vgvassilev merged commit e788167 into compiler-research:main May 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants