diff --git a/docs/source/en/optimization/torch2.0.mdx b/docs/source/en/optimization/torch2.0.mdx
index 206ac4e447cc..2bcf3fa82115 100644
--- a/docs/source/en/optimization/torch2.0.mdx
+++ b/docs/source/en/optimization/torch2.0.mdx
@@ -12,19 +12,20 @@ specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 
 # Accelerated PyTorch 2.0 support in Diffusers
 
-Starting from version `0.13.0`, Diffusers supports the latest optimization from the upcoming [PyTorch 2.0](https://pytorch.org/get-started/pytorch-2.0/) release. These include:
-1. Support for accelerated transformers implementation with memory-efficient attention – no extra dependencies required.
+Starting from version `0.13.0`, Diffusers supports the latest optimization from [PyTorch 2.0](https://pytorch.org/get-started/pytorch-2.0/). These include:
+1. Support for accelerated transformers implementation with memory-efficient attention – no extra dependencies (such as `xformers`) required.
 2. [torch.compile](https://pytorch.org/tutorials/intermediate/torch_compile_tutorial.html) support for extra performance boost when individual models are compiled.
 
 
 ## Installation
-To benefit from the accelerated attention implementation and `torch.compile`, you just need to install the latest versions of PyTorch 2.0 from `pip`, and make sure you are on diffusers 0.13.0 or later. As explained below, `diffusers` automatically uses the attention optimizations (but not `torch.compile`) when available.
+To benefit from the accelerated attention implementation and `torch.compile()`, you just need to install the latest versions of PyTorch 2.0 from pip, and make sure you are on diffusers 0.13.0 or later. As explained below, diffusers automatically uses the optimized attention processor ([`AttnProcessor2_0`](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/1a5797c6d4491a879ea5285c4efc377664e0332d/src/diffusers/models/attention_processor.py#L798)) (but not `torch.compile()`)
+when PyTorch 2.0 is available.
 
 ```bash
 pip install --upgrade torch torchvision diffusers
 ```
 
-## Using accelerated transformers and torch.compile.
+## Using accelerated transformers and `torch.compile`.
 
 
 1. **Accelerated Transformers implementation**
@@ -46,13 +47,13 @@ pip install --upgrade torch torchvision diffusers
 
     If you want to enable it explicitly (which is not required), you can do so as shown below.
 
-    ```Python
+    ```diff
     import torch
     from diffusers import DiffusionPipeline
-    from diffusers.models.attention_processor import AttnProcessor2_0
+    + from diffusers.models.attention_processor import AttnProcessor2_0
 
     pipe = DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained("runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5", torch_dtype=torch.float16).to("cuda")
-    pipe.unet.set_attn_processor(AttnProcessor2_0())
+    + pipe.unet.set_attn_processor(AttnProcessor2_0())
 
     prompt = "a photo of an astronaut riding a horse on mars"
     image = pipe(prompt).images[0]
@@ -60,151 +61,383 @@ pip install --upgrade torch torchvision diffusers
 
     This should be as fast and memory efficient as `xFormers`. More details [in our benchmark](#benchmark).
 
+    It is possible to revert to the vanilla attention processor ([`AttnProcessor`](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/1a5797c6d4491a879ea5285c4efc377664e0332d/src/diffusers/models/attention_processor.py#L402)), which can be helpful to make the pipeline more deterministic, or if you need to convert a fine-tuned model to other formats such as [Core ML](https://huggingface.co/docs/diffusers/v0.16.0/en/optimization/coreml#how-to-run-stable-diffusion-with-core-ml). To use the normal attention processor you can use the [`~diffusers.UNet2DConditionModel.set_default_attn_processor`] function:
 
-2. **torch.compile**
-
-    To get an additional speedup, we can use the new `torch.compile` feature. To do so, we simply wrap our `unet` with `torch.compile`. For more information and different options, refer to the 
-    [torch compile docs](https://pytorch.org/tutorials/intermediate/torch_compile_tutorial.html).
-
-    ```python
+    ```Python
     import torch
     from diffusers import DiffusionPipeline
+    from diffusers.models.attention_processor import AttnProcessor
 
     pipe = DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained("runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5", torch_dtype=torch.float16).to("cuda")
-    pipe.unet = torch.compile(pipe.unet)
+    pipe.unet.set_default_attn_processor()
 
-    batch_size = 10
-    prompt = "A photo of an astronaut riding a horse on marse."
+    prompt = "a photo of an astronaut riding a horse on mars"
+    image = pipe(prompt).images[0]
+    ```
+
+2. **torch.compile**
+
+    To get an additional speedup, we can use the new `torch.compile` feature. Since the UNet of the pipeline is usually the most computationally expensive, we wrap the `unet` with `torch.compile` leaving rest of the sub-models (text encoder and VAE) as is. For more information and different options, refer to the 
+    [torch compile docs](https://pytorch.org/tutorials/intermediate/torch_compile_tutorial.html).
+
+    ```python
+    pipe.unet = torch.compile(pipe.unet, mode="reduce-overhead", fullgraph=True)
     images = pipe(prompt, num_inference_steps=steps, num_images_per_prompt=batch_size).images
     ```
 
-    Depending on the type of GPU, `compile()` can yield between 2-9% of _additional speed-up_ over the accelerated transformer optimizations. Note, however, that compilation is able to squeeze more performance improvements in more recent GPU architectures such as Ampere (A100, 3090), Ada (4090) and Hopper (H100).
+    Depending on the type of GPU, `compile()` can yield between **5% - 300%** of _additional speed-up_ over the accelerated transformer optimizations. Note, however, that compilation is able to squeeze more performance improvements in more recent GPU architectures such as Ampere (A100, 3090), Ada (4090) and Hopper (H100).
     
-    Compilation takes some time to complete, so it is best suited for situations where you need to prepare your pipeline once and then perform the same type of inference operations multiple times.
+    Compilation takes some time to complete, so it is best suited for situations where you need to prepare your pipeline once and then perform the same type of inference operations multiple times. Calling the compiled pipeline on a different image size will re-trigger compilation which can be expensive.
 
 
 ## Benchmark
 
-We conducted a simple benchmark on different GPUs to compare vanilla attention, xFormers, `torch.nn.functional.scaled_dot_product_attention` and `torch.compile+torch.nn.functional.scaled_dot_product_attention`.
-For the benchmark we used the [stable-diffusion-v1-4](https://huggingface.co/CompVis/stable-diffusion-v1-4) model with 50 steps. The `xFormers` benchmark is done using the `torch==1.13.1` version, while the accelerated transformers optimizations are tested using nightly versions of PyTorch 2.0. The tables below summarize the results we got.
-
-Please refer to [our featured blog post in the PyTorch site](https://pytorch.org/blog/accelerated-diffusers-pt-20/) for more details.
-
-### FP16 benchmark
-
-The table below shows the benchmark results for inference using `fp16`. As we can see, `torch.nn.functional.scaled_dot_product_attention` is as fast as `xFormers` (sometimes slightly faster/slower) on all the GPUs we tested.
-And using `torch.compile` gives further speed-up of up of 10% over `xFormers`, but it's mostly noticeable on the A100 GPU.
-
-___The time reported is in seconds.___
-
-| GPU | Batch Size | Vanilla Attention | xFormers | PyTorch2.0 SDPA | SDPA + torch.compile | Speed over xformers (%) |
-| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
-| A100 | 1 | 2.69 | 2.7 | 1.98 | 2.47 | 8.52 |
-| A100 | 2 | 3.21 | 3.04 | 2.38 | 2.78 | 8.55 |
-| A100 | 4 | 5.27 | 3.91 | 3.89 | 3.53 | 9.72 |
-| A100 | 8 | 9.74 | 7.03 | 7.04 | 6.62 | 5.83 |
-| A100 | 10 | 12.02 | 8.7 | 8.67 | 8.45 | 2.87 |
-| A100 | 16 | 18.95 | 13.57 | 13.55 | 13.20 | 2.73 |
-| A100 | 32 (1) | OOM | 26.56 | 26.68 | 25.85 | 2.67 |
-| A100 | 64 | | 52.51 | 53.03 | 50.93 | 3.01 |
-| | | | | | | |
-| A10 | 4 | 13.94 | 9.81 | 10.01 | 9.35 | 4.69 |
-| A10 | 8 | 27.09 | 19 | 19.53 | 18.33 | 3.53 |
-| A10 | 10 | 33.69 | 23.53 | 24.19 | 22.52 | 4.29 |
-| A10 | 16 | OOM | 37.55 | 38.31 | 36.81 | 1.97 |
-| A10 | 32 (1) | | 77.19 | 78.43 | 76.64 | 0.71 |
-| A10 | 64 (1) | | 173.59 | 158.99 | 155.14 | 10.63 |
-| | | | | | | |
-| T4 | 4 | 38.81 | 30.09 | 29.74 | 27.55 | 8.44 |
-| T4 | 8 | OOM | 55.71 | 55.99 | 53.85 | 3.34 |
-| T4 | 10 | OOM | 68.96 | 69.86 | 65.35 | 5.23 |
-| T4 | 16 | OOM | 111.47 | 113.26  | 106.93  | 4.07 |
-| | | | | | | |
-| V100 | 4 | 9.84 | 8.16 | 8.09 | 7.65 | 6.25 |
-| V100 | 8 | OOM | 15.62 | 15.44 | 14.59 | 6.59 |
-| V100 | 10 | OOM | 19.52 | 19.28 | 18.18 | 6.86 |
-| V100 | 16 | OOM | 30.29 | 29.84 | 28.22 | 6.83 |
-| | | | | | | |
-| 3090 | 1 | 2.94 | 2.5 | 2.42 | 2.33 | 6.80 |
-| 3090 | 4 | 10.04 | 7.82 | 7.72 | 7.38 | 5.63 |
-| 3090 | 8 | 19.27 | 14.97 | 14.88 | 14.15 | 5.48 |
-| 3090 | 10| 24.08 | 18.7 | 18.62 | 18.12 | 3.10 |
-| 3090 | 16 | OOM | 29.06 | 28.88 | 28.2 | 2.96 |
-| 3090 | 32 (1) | | 58.05 | 57.42 | 56.28 | 3.05 |
-| 3090 | 64 (1) | | 126.54 | 114.27 | 112.21 | 11.32 |
-| | | | | | | |
-| 3090 Ti | 1 | 2.7 | 2.26 | 2.19 | 2.12 | 6.19 |
-| 3090 Ti | 4 | 9.07 | 7.14 | 7.00 | 6.71 | 6.02 |
-| 3090 Ti | 8 | 17.51 | 13.65 | 13.53 | 12.94 | 5.20 |
-| 3090 Ti | 10 (2) | 21.79 | 16.85 | 16.77 | 16.44 | 2.43 |
-| 3090 Ti | 16 | OOM | 26.1 | 26.04 | 25.53 | 2.18 |
-| 3090 Ti | 32 (1) | | 51.78 | 51.71 | 50.91 | 1.68 |
-| 3090 Ti | 64 (1) | | 112.02 | 102.78 | 100.89 | 9.94 |
-| | | | | | | |
-| 4090 | 1 | 4.47 | 3.98 | 1.28 | 1.21 | 69.60 |
-| 4090 | 4 | 10.48 | 8.37 | 3.76 | 3.56 | 57.47 |
-| 4090 | 8 | 14.33 | 10.22 | 7.43 | 6.99 | 31.60 |
-| 4090 | 16 | | 17.07 | 14.98 | 14.58 | 14.59 |
-| 4090 | 32 (1) | | 39.03 | 30.18 | 29.49 | 24.44 |
-| 4090 | 64 (1) | | 77.29 | 61.34 | 59.96 | 22.42 |
-
-
-				
-### FP32 benchmark
-
-The table below shows the benchmark results for inference using `fp32`. In this case, `torch.nn.functional.scaled_dot_product_attention` is faster than `xFormers` on all the GPUs we tested.
-
-Using `torch.compile` in addition to the accelerated transformers implementation can yield up to 19% performance improvement over `xFormers` in Ampere and Ada cards, and up to 20% (Ampere) or 28% (Ada) over vanilla attention.
-
-| GPU | Batch Size | Vanilla Attention | xFormers | PyTorch2.0 SDPA | SDPA + torch.compile | Speed over xformers (%) | Speed over vanilla (%) |
-| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
-| A100 | 1 | 4.97 | 3.86 | 2.6 | 2.86 | 25.91 | 42.45 |
-| A100 | 2 | 9.03 | 6.76 | 4.41 | 4.21 | 37.72 | 53.38 |
-| A100 | 4 | 16.70 | 12.42 | 7.94 | 7.54 | 39.29 | 54.85 |
-| A100 | 10 | OOM | 29.93 | 18.70 | 18.46 | 38.32 | |
-| A100 | 16 | | 47.08 | 29.41 | 29.04 | 38.32 | |
-| A100 | 32 | | 92.89 | 57.55 | 56.67 | 38.99 | |
-| A100 | 64 | | 185.3 | 114.8 | 112.98 | 39.03 | |
-| | | | | | | |
-| A10 | 1 | 10.59 | 8.81 | 7.51 | 7.35 | 16.57 | 30.59 |
-| A10 | 4 | 34.77 | 27.63 | 22.77 | 22.07 | 20.12 | 36.53 |
-| A10 | 8 | | 56.19 | 43.53 | 43.86 | 21.94 | |
-| A10 | 16 | | 116.49 | 88.56 | 86.64 | 25.62 | |
-| A10 | 32 | | 221.95 | 175.74 | 168.18 | 24.23 | |
-| A10 | 48 | | 333.23 | 264.84 | | 20.52 | |
-| | | | | | | |
-| T4 | 1 | 28.2 | 24.49 | 23.93 | 23.56 | 3.80 | 16.45 |
-| T4 | 2 | 52.77 | 45.7 | 45.88 | 45.06 | 1.40 | 14.61 |
-| T4 | 4 | OOM | 85.72 | 85.78 | 84.48 | 1.45 | |
-| T4 | 8 | | 149.64 | 150.75 | 148.4 | 0.83 | |
-| | | | | | | |
-| V100 | 1 | 7.4 | 6.84 | 6.8 | 6.66 | 2.63 | 10.00 |
-| V100 | 2 | 13.85 | 12.81 | 12.66 | 12.35 | 3.59 | 10.83 |
-| V100 | 4 | OOM | 25.73 | 25.31 | 24.78 | 3.69 | |
-| V100 | 8 | | 43.95 | 43.37 | 42.25 | 3.87 | |
-| V100 | 16 | | 84.99 | 84.73 | 82.55 | 2.87 | |
-| | | | | | | |
-| 3090 | 1 | 7.09 | 6.78 | 5.34 | 5.35 | 21.09 | 24.54 |
-| 3090 | 4 | 22.69 | 21.45 | 18.56 | 18.18 | 15.24 | 19.88 |
-| 3090 | 8 | | 42.59 | 36.68 | 35.61 | 16.39 | |
-| 3090 | 16 | | 85.35 | 72.93 | 70.18 | 17.77 | |
-| 3090 | 32 (1) | | 162.05 | 143.46 | 138.67 | 14.43 | |
-| | | | | | | |
-| 3090 Ti | 1 | 6.45 | 6.19 | 4.99 | 4.89 | 21.00 | 24.19 |
-| 3090 Ti | 4 | 20.32 | 19.31 | 17.02 | 16.48 | 14.66 | 18.90 |
-| 3090 Ti | 8 | | 37.93 | 33.21 | 32.24 | 15.00 | |
-| 3090 Ti | 16 | | 75.37 | 66.63 | 64.5 | 14.42 | |
-| 3090 Ti | 32 (1) | | 142.55 | 128.89 | 124.92 | 12.37 | |
-| | | | | | | |
-| 4090 | 1 | 5.54 | 4.99 | 2.66 | 2.58 | 48.30 | 53.43 |
-| 4090 | 4 | 13.67 | 11.4 | 8.81 | 8.46 | 25.79 | 38.11 |
-| 4090 | 8 |  | 19.79 | 17.55 | 16.62 | 16.02 |  |
-| 4090 | 16 |  | 38.62 | 35.65 | 34.07 | 11.78 |  |
-| 4090 | 32 (1) |  | 76.57 | 69.48 | 65.35 | 14.65 |  |
-| 4090 | 48 |  | 114.44 | 106.3 |  | 7.11 |  |
-
-
-(1) Batch Size >= 32 requires enable_vae_slicing() because of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/81665.
-This is required for PyTorch 1.13.1, and also for PyTorch 2.0 and large batch sizes.
-
-For more details about how this benchmark was run, please refer to [this PR](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/pull/2303) and to [the blog post](https://pytorch.org/blog/accelerated-diffusers-pt-20/).
+We conducted a comprehensive benchmark with PyTorch 2.0's efficient attention implementation and `torch.compile` across different GPUs and batch sizes for five of our most used pipelines. We used `diffusers 0.17.0.dev0`, which [makes sure `torch.compile()` is leveraged optimally](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/pull/3313).
+
+### Benchmarking code 
+
+#### Stable Diffusion text-to-image 
+
+```python 
+from diffusers import DiffusionPipeline
+import torch
+
+path = "runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5"
+
+run_compile = True  # Set True / False
+
+pipe = DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained(path, torch_dtype=torch.float16)
+pipe = pipe.to("cuda")
+pipe.unet.to(memory_format=torch.channels_last)
+
+if run_compile:
+    print("Run torch compile")
+    pipe.unet = torch.compile(pipe.unet, mode="reduce-overhead", fullgraph=True)
+
+prompt = "ghibli style, a fantasy landscape with castles"
+
+for _ in range(3):
+    images = pipe(prompt=prompt).images
+```
+
+#### Stable Diffusion image-to-image 
+
+```python 
+from diffusers import StableDiffusionImg2ImgPipeline
+import requests
+import torch
+from PIL import Image
+from io import BytesIO
+
+url = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CompVis/stable-diffusion/main/assets/stable-samples/img2img/sketch-mountains-input.jpg"
+
+response = requests.get(url)
+init_image = Image.open(BytesIO(response.content)).convert("RGB")
+init_image = init_image.resize((512, 512))
+
+path = "runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5"
+
+run_compile = True  # Set True / False
+
+pipe = StableDiffusionImg2ImgPipeline.from_pretrained(path, torch_dtype=torch.float16)
+pipe = pipe.to("cuda")
+pipe.unet.to(memory_format=torch.channels_last)
+
+if run_compile:
+    print("Run torch compile")
+    pipe.unet = torch.compile(pipe.unet, mode="reduce-overhead", fullgraph=True)
+
+prompt = "ghibli style, a fantasy landscape with castles"
+
+for _ in range(3):
+    image = pipe(prompt=prompt, image=init_image).images[0]
+```
+
+#### Stable Diffusion - inpatining 
+
+```python 
+from diffusers import StableDiffusionInpaintPipeline
+import requests
+import torch
+from PIL import Image
+from io import BytesIO
+
+url = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CompVis/stable-diffusion/main/assets/stable-samples/img2img/sketch-mountains-input.jpg"
+
+def download_image(url):
+    response = requests.get(url)
+    return Image.open(BytesIO(response.content)).convert("RGB")
+
+
+img_url = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CompVis/latent-diffusion/main/data/inpainting_examples/overture-creations-5sI6fQgYIuo.png"
+mask_url = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CompVis/latent-diffusion/main/data/inpainting_examples/overture-creations-5sI6fQgYIuo_mask.png"
+
+init_image = download_image(img_url).resize((512, 512))
+mask_image = download_image(mask_url).resize((512, 512))
+
+path = "runwayml/stable-diffusion-inpainting"
+
+run_compile = True  # Set True / False
+
+pipe = StableDiffusionInpaintPipeline.from_pretrained(path, torch_dtype=torch.float16)
+pipe = pipe.to("cuda")
+pipe.unet.to(memory_format=torch.channels_last)
+
+if run_compile:
+    print("Run torch compile")
+    pipe.unet = torch.compile(pipe.unet, mode="reduce-overhead", fullgraph=True)
+
+prompt = "ghibli style, a fantasy landscape with castles"
+
+for _ in range(3):
+    image = pipe(prompt=prompt, image=init_image, mask_image=mask_image).images[0]
+```
+
+#### ControlNet 
+
+```python 
+from diffusers import StableDiffusionControlNetPipeline, ControlNetModel
+import requests
+import torch
+from PIL import Image
+from io import BytesIO
+
+url = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CompVis/stable-diffusion/main/assets/stable-samples/img2img/sketch-mountains-input.jpg"
+
+response = requests.get(url)
+init_image = Image.open(BytesIO(response.content)).convert("RGB")
+init_image = init_image.resize((512, 512))
+
+path = "runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5"
+
+run_compile = True  # Set True / False
+controlnet = ControlNetModel.from_pretrained("lllyasviel/sd-controlnet-canny", torch_dtype=torch.float16)
+pipe = StableDiffusionControlNetPipeline.from_pretrained(
+    path, controlnet=controlnet, torch_dtype=torch.float16
+)
+
+pipe = pipe.to("cuda")
+pipe.unet.to(memory_format=torch.channels_last)
+pipe.controlnet.to(memory_format=torch.channels_last)
+
+if run_compile:
+    print("Run torch compile")
+    pipe.unet = torch.compile(pipe.unet, mode="reduce-overhead", fullgraph=True)
+    pipe.controlnet = torch.compile(pipe.controlnet, mode="reduce-overhead", fullgraph=True)
+
+prompt = "ghibli style, a fantasy landscape with castles"
+
+for _ in range(3):
+    image = pipe(prompt=prompt, image=init_image).images[0]
+```
+
+#### IF text-to-image + upscaling
+
+```python 
+from diffusers import DiffusionPipeline
+import torch
+
+run_compile = True  # Set True / False
+
+pipe = DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained("DeepFloyd/IF-I-M-v1.0", variant="fp16", text_encoder=None, torch_dtype=torch.float16)
+pipe.to("cuda")
+pipe_2 = DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained("DeepFloyd/IF-II-M-v1.0", variant="fp16", text_encoder=None, torch_dtype=torch.float16)
+pipe_2.to("cuda")
+pipe_3 = DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained("stabilityai/stable-diffusion-x4-upscaler", torch_dtype=torch.float16)
+pipe_3.to("cuda")
+
+
+pipe.unet.to(memory_format=torch.channels_last)
+pipe_2.unet.to(memory_format=torch.channels_last)
+pipe_3.unet.to(memory_format=torch.channels_last)
+
+if run_compile:
+    pipe.unet = torch.compile(pipe.unet, mode="reduce-overhead", fullgraph=True)
+    pipe_2.unet = torch.compile(pipe_2.unet, mode="reduce-overhead", fullgraph=True)
+    pipe_3.unet = torch.compile(pipe_3.unet, mode="reduce-overhead", fullgraph=True)
+
+prompt = "the blue hulk"
+
+prompt_embeds = torch.randn((1, 2, 4096), dtype=torch.float16)
+neg_prompt_embeds = torch.randn((1, 2, 4096), dtype=torch.float16)
+
+for _ in range(3):
+    image = pipe(prompt_embeds=prompt_embeds, negative_prompt_embeds=neg_prompt_embeds, output_type="pt").images
+    image_2 = pipe_2(image=image, prompt_embeds=prompt_embeds, negative_prompt_embeds=neg_prompt_embeds, output_type="pt").images
+    image_3 = pipe_3(prompt=prompt, image=image, noise_level=100).images
+```
+
+To give you a pictorial overview of the possible speed-ups that can be obtained with PyTorch 2.0 and `torch.compile()`,
+here is a plot that shows relative speed-ups for the [Stable Diffusion text-to-image pipeline](StableDiffusionPipeline) across five
+different GPU families (with a batch size of 4):
+
+![t2i_speedup](https://huggingface.co/datasets/diffusers/docs-images/resolve/main/pt2_benchmarks/t2i_speedup.png)
+
+To give you an even better idea of how this speed-up holds for the other pipelines presented above, consider the following 
+plot that shows the benchmarking numbers from an A100 across three different batch sizes
+(with PyTorch 2.0 nightly and `torch.compile()`):
+
+![a100_numbers](https://huggingface.co/datasets/diffusers/docs-images/resolve/main/pt2_benchmarks/a100_numbers.png)
+
+_(Our benchmarking metric for the plots above is **number of iterations/second**)_
+
+But we reveal all the benchmarking numbers in the interest of transparency! 
+
+In the following tables, we report our findings in terms of the number of **_iterations processed per second_**. 
+
+### A100 (batch size: 1)
+
+| **Pipeline** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch nightly - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** | **torch nightly - <br>compile** |
+|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
+| SD - txt2img | 21.66 | 23.13 | 44.03 | 49.74 |
+| SD - img2img | 21.81 | 22.40 | 43.92 | 46.32 |
+| SD - inpaint | 22.24 | 23.23 | 43.76 | 49.25 |
+| SD - controlnet | 15.02 | 15.82 | 32.13 | 36.08 |
+| IF | 20.21 / <br>13.84 / <br>24.00 | 20.12 / <br>13.70 / <br>24.03 | ❌ | 97.34 / <br>27.23 / <br>111.66 |
+
+### A100 (batch size: 4)
+
+| **Pipeline** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch nightly - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** | **torch nightly - <br>compile** |
+|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
+| SD - txt2img | 11.6 | 13.12 | 14.62 | 17.27 |
+| SD - img2img | 11.47 | 13.06 | 14.66 | 17.25 |
+| SD - inpaint | 11.67 | 13.31 | 14.88 | 17.48 |
+| SD - controlnet | 8.28 | 9.38 | 10.51 | 12.41 |
+| IF | 25.02 | 18.04 | ❌ | 48.47 |
+
+### A100 (batch size: 16)
+
+| **Pipeline** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch nightly - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** | **torch nightly - <br>compile** |
+|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
+| SD - txt2img | 3.04 | 3.6 | 3.83 | 4.68 |
+| SD - img2img | 2.98 | 3.58 | 3.83 | 4.67 |
+| SD - inpaint | 3.04 | 3.66 | 3.9 | 4.76 |
+| SD - controlnet | 2.15 | 2.58 | 2.74 | 3.35 |
+| IF | 8.78 | 9.82 | ❌ | 16.77 |
+
+### V100 (batch size: 1)
+
+| **Pipeline** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch nightly - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** | **torch nightly - <br>compile** |
+|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
+| SD - txt2img | 18.99 | 19.14 | 20.95 | 22.17 |
+| SD - img2img | 18.56 | 19.18 | 20.95 | 22.11 |
+| SD - inpaint | 19.14 | 19.06 | 21.08 | 22.20 |
+| SD - controlnet | 13.48 | 13.93 | 15.18 | 15.88 |
+| IF |  20.01 / <br>9.08 / <br>23.34 | 19.79 / <br>8.98 / <br>24.10 | ❌ | 55.75 / <br>11.57 / <br>57.67 |
+
+### V100 (batch size: 4)
+
+| **Pipeline** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch nightly - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** | **torch nightly - <br>compile** |
+|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
+| SD - txt2img | 5.96 | 5.89 | 6.83 | 6.86 |
+| SD - img2img | 5.90 | 5.91 | 6.81 | 6.82 |
+| SD - inpaint | 5.99 | 6.03 | 6.93 | 6.95 |
+| SD - controlnet | 4.26 | 4.29 | 4.92 | 4.93 |
+| IF | 15.41 | 14.76 | ❌ | 22.95 |
+
+### V100 (batch size: 16)
+
+| **Pipeline** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch nightly - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** | **torch nightly - <br>compile** |
+|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
+| SD - txt2img | 1.66 | 1.66 | 1.92 | 1.90 |
+| SD - img2img | 1.65 | 1.65 | 1.91 | 1.89 |
+| SD - inpaint | 1.69 | 1.69 | 1.95 | 1.93 |
+| SD - controlnet | 1.19 | 1.19 | OOM after warmup | 1.36 |
+| IF | 5.43 | 5.29 | ❌ | 7.06 |
+
+### T4 (batch size: 1)
+
+| **Pipeline** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch nightly - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** | **torch nightly - <br>compile** |
+|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
+| SD - txt2img | 6.9 | 6.95 | 7.3 | 7.56 |
+| SD - img2img | 6.84 | 6.99 | 7.04 | 7.55 |
+| SD - inpaint | 6.91 | 6.7 | 7.01 | 7.37 |
+| SD - controlnet | 4.89 | 4.86 | 5.35 | 5.48 |
+| IF | 17.42 / <br>2.47 / <br>18.52 | 16.96 / <br>2.45 / <br>18.69 | ❌ | 24.63 / <br>2.47 / <br>23.39 |
+
+### T4 (batch size: 4)
+
+| **Pipeline** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch nightly - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** | **torch nightly - <br>compile** |
+|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
+| SD - txt2img | 1.79 | 1.79 | 2.03 | 1.99 |
+| SD - img2img | 1.77 | 1.77 | 2.05 | 2.04 |
+| SD - inpaint | 1.81 | 1.82 | 2.09 | 2.09 |
+| SD - controlnet | 1.34 | 1.27 | 1.47 | 1.46 |
+| IF | 5.79 |  5.61 | ❌ | 7.39 |
+
+### T4 (batch size: 16)
+
+| **Pipeline** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch nightly - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** | **torch nightly - <br>compile** |
+|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
+| SD - txt2img | 2.34s | 2.30s | OOM after 2nd iteration | 1.99s |
+| SD - img2img | 2.35s | 2.31s | OOM after warmup | 2.00s |
+| SD - inpaint | 2.30s | 2.26s | OOM after 2nd iteration | 1.95s |
+| SD - controlnet | OOM after 2nd iteration | OOM after 2nd iteration | OOM after warmup | OOM after warmup |
+| IF * | 1.44 | 1.44 | ❌ | 1.94 |
+
+### RTX 3090 (batch size: 1)
+
+| **Pipeline** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch nightly - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** | **torch nightly - <br>compile** |
+|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
+| SD - txt2img | 22.56 | 22.84 | 23.84 | 25.69 |
+| SD - img2img | 22.25 | 22.61 | 24.1 | 25.83 |
+| SD - inpaint | 22.22 | 22.54 | 24.26 | 26.02 |
+| SD - controlnet | 16.03 | 16.33 | 17.38 | 18.56 |
+| IF | 27.08 / <br>9.07 / <br>31.23 | 26.75 / <br>8.92 / <br>31.47 | ❌ | 68.08 / <br>11.16 / <br>65.29 |
+
+### RTX 3090 (batch size: 4)
+
+| **Pipeline** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch nightly - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** | **torch nightly - <br>compile** |
+|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
+| SD - txt2img | 6.46 | 6.35 | 7.29 | 7.3 |
+| SD - img2img | 6.33 | 6.27 | 7.31 | 7.26 |
+| SD - inpaint | 6.47 | 6.4 | 7.44 | 7.39 |
+| SD - controlnet | 4.59 | 4.54 | 5.27 | 5.26 |
+| IF | 16.81 | 16.62 | ❌ | 21.57 |
+
+### RTX 3090 (batch size: 16)
+
+| **Pipeline** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch nightly - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** | **torch nightly - <br>compile** |
+|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
+| SD - txt2img | 1.7 | 1.69 | 1.93 | 1.91 |
+| SD - img2img | 1.68 | 1.67 | 1.93 | 1.9 |
+| SD - inpaint | 1.72 | 1.71 | 1.97 | 1.94 |
+| SD - controlnet | 1.23 | 1.22 | 1.4 | 1.38 |
+| IF | 5.01 | 5.00 | ❌ | 6.33 |
+
+### RTX 4090 (batch size: 1)
+
+| **Pipeline** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch nightly - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** | **torch nightly - <br>compile** |
+|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
+| SD - txt2img | 40.5 | 41.89 | 44.65 | 49.81 |
+| SD - img2img | 40.39 | 41.95 | 44.46 | 49.8 |
+| SD - inpaint | 40.51 | 41.88 | 44.58 | 49.72 |
+| SD - controlnet | 29.27 | 30.29 | 32.26 | 36.03 |
+| IF | 69.71 / <br>18.78 / <br>85.49 | 69.13 / <br>18.80 / <br>85.56 | ❌ | 124.60 / <br>26.37 / <br>138.79 |
+
+### RTX 4090 (batch size: 4)
+
+| **Pipeline** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch nightly - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** | **torch nightly - <br>compile** |
+|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
+| SD - txt2img | 12.62 | 12.84 | 15.32 | 15.59 |
+| SD - img2img | 12.61 | 12,.79 | 15.35 | 15.66 |
+| SD - inpaint | 12.65 | 12.81 | 15.3 | 15.58 |
+| SD - controlnet | 9.1 | 9.25 | 11.03 | 11.22 |
+| IF | 31.88 | 31.14 | ❌ | 43.92 |
+
+### RTX 4090 (batch size: 16)
+
+| **Pipeline** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch nightly - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** | **torch nightly - <br>compile** |
+|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
+| SD - txt2img | 3.17 | 3.2 | 3.84 | 3.85 |
+| SD - img2img | 3.16 | 3.2 | 3.84 | 3.85 |
+| SD - inpaint | 3.17 | 3.2 | 3.85 | 3.85 |
+| SD - controlnet | 2.23 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 2.75 |
+| IF | 9.26 | 9.2 | ❌ | 13.31 |
+
+## Notes 
+
+* Follow [this PR](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/pull/3313) for more details on the environment used for conducting the benchmarks. 
+* For the IF pipeline and batch sizes > 1, we only used a batch size of >1 in the first IF pipeline for text-to-image generation and NOT for upscaling. So, that means the two upscaling pipelines received a batch size of 1. 
+
+*Thanks to [Horace He](https://github.com/Chillee) from the PyTorch team for their support in improving our support of `torch.compile()` in Diffusers.*
\ No newline at end of file