-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 117
Merge 'main' branch to 'release/6.2' #1088
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
stmontgomery
merged 24 commits into
swiftlang:release/6.2
from
stmontgomery:main-6.2-merge
Apr 24, 2025
Merged
Merge 'main' branch to 'release/6.2' #1088
stmontgomery
merged 24 commits into
swiftlang:release/6.2
from
stmontgomery:main-6.2-merge
Apr 24, 2025
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…y linking. (swiftlang#1035)" This reverts commit ee700e2.
Revert "Ensure `Locked+Platform.swift` is not stripped when statically linking. (swiftlang#1035)"
This PR has a few minor changes: - The default implementation of `DiscoverableAsTestContent._testContentTypeNameHint` is not present if `SWT_NO_LEGACY_TEST_DISCOVERY` is defined; - Fixed the precondition in `TestContentKind.init(stringLiteral:)` so it doesn't call `utf8CodeUnitCount` on single-character static strings; - The implementation of `TestContentKind._fourCCValue` uses `isprint()` to check if the kind value looks like a FourCC rather than calling ICU-based functions; - Fixed a type in a comment on `SectionBounds.Kind.segmentAndSectionName`; and - Simplified the implementation of `TestContentKind.commentRepresentation` (in the macro target). ### Checklist: - [x] Code and documentation should follow the style of the [Style Guide](https://github.com/apple/swift-testing/blob/main/Documentation/StyleGuide.md). - [x] If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should be updated.
This PR uses the entire 256 bits of the computed SHA-256 hash for an exit test's ID, not just the first 128. They're there, might as well use them. ### Checklist: - [x] Code and documentation should follow the style of the [Style Guide](https://github.com/apple/swift-testing/blob/main/Documentation/StyleGuide.md). - [x] If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should be updated.
The special-case signal handling implemented for Windows doesn't currently set a handler for `SIGABRT_COMPAT` (which is a synonym of `SIGABRT` with a different value.) This PR adds it to the list of signals we install handlers for. ### Checklist: - [x] Code and documentation should follow the style of the [Style Guide](https://github.com/apple/swift-testing/blob/main/Documentation/StyleGuide.md). - [x] If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should be updated.
…get. (swiftlang#1043) This PR adds preliminary/experimental support for Embedded Swift _to the `_TestDiscovery` target only_ when building Swift Testing as a package. To try it out, you must set the environment variable `SWT_EMBEDDED` to `true` before building. Tested with the following incantation using the 2025-03-28 main-branch toolchain: ```sh SWT_EMBEDDED=1 swift build --target _TestDiscovery --triple arm64-apple-macosx ``` ### Checklist: - [x] Code and documentation should follow the style of the [Style Guide](https://github.com/apple/swift-testing/blob/main/Documentation/StyleGuide.md). - [x] If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should be updated.
This PR replaces the private `_CurrentContainer` class used to store the current exit test with a bare pointer. The class is prone to duplicate definitions, but we really just use it as a glorified box type for the move-only `ExitTest`, so an immortal pointer will work just as well. Works around rdar://148837303. ### Checklist: - [x] Code and documentation should follow the style of the [Style Guide](https://github.com/apple/swift-testing/blob/main/Documentation/StyleGuide.md). - [x] If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should be updated.
…n code for synchronous test functions (swiftlang#1067) This fixes a compilation error in code expanded from the `@Test` macro when it's attached to a synchronous (i.e. non-`async`) test function in a context where there is a concrete type named `Actor`. For example, the following code reproduces the error: ```swift // In MyApp public class Actor {} // In test code import Testing import MyApp // ❌ 'any' has no effect on concrete type 'Actor' // - 'isolated' parameter type 'Actor?' does not conform to 'Actor' or 'DistributedActor' @test func example() /* No 'async' */ {} ``` The macro code includes an unqualified reference to a type by that name, but it's intended to refer to the protocol in Swift's `_Concurrency` module. The fix is to ensure the macro's reference to this protocol is fully-qualified with a module name. This was first reported on the Swift Forums in https://forums.swift.org/t/error-isolated-parameter-type-actor-does-not-conform-to-actor-or-distributedactor/79190. This bug was introduced in swiftlang#747, which first landed in Swift 6.1 and Xcode 16.3. ### Checklist: - [x] Code and documentation should follow the style of the [Style Guide](https://github.com/apple/swift-testing/blob/main/Documentation/StyleGuide.md). - [x] If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should be updated.
This PR promotes attachments to API and makes the appropriate changes to match what was approved in the review of [ST-0009](https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-evolution/blob/main/proposals/testing/0009-attachments.md). ### Checklist: - [x] Code and documentation should follow the style of the [Style Guide](https://github.com/apple/swift-testing/blob/main/Documentation/StyleGuide.md). - [x] If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should be updated.
Introduce a severity level when recording issues ### Motivation: In order to create issues that don't fail a test this introduces a parameter to specify the severity of the issue. This is in support of work added here for an issue severity: swiftlang#931 This is experimental. Example usage: `Issue.record("My comment", severity: .warning)` ### Modifications: I modified the `Issue.record` method signature to take in a severity level so that users can create issues that are not failing. ### Checklist: - [x] Code and documentation should follow the style of the [Style Guide](https://github.com/apple/swift-testing/blob/main/Documentation/StyleGuide.md). - [x] If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should be updated. - [x] Add tests
This PR adds support for the `--attachments-path` CLI argument on `swift test` as approved in [ST-0009](https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-evolution/blob/main/proposals/testing/0009-attachments.md). We will maintain support for the older `--experimental-attachments-path` version through Swift 6.2. Resolves rdar://147753783. ### Checklist: - [x] Code and documentation should follow the style of the [Style Guide](https://github.com/apple/swift-testing/blob/main/Documentation/StyleGuide.md). - [x] If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should be updated.
… `StatusAtExit`. (swiftlang#1073) This PR adds `CustomStringConvertible` conformance to these data/value types so that they are presented reasonably in expectation failure messages or when printed. Strictly speaking, API changes should go through a review, but there's not really anything to review here, so with the consent of the Testing Workgroup we can amend the exit tests proposal to retroactively include these conformances. See also: swiftlang/swift-evolution#2789 ### Checklist: - [x] Code and documentation should follow the style of the [Style Guide](https://github.com/apple/swift-testing/blob/main/Documentation/StyleGuide.md). - [x] If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should be updated.
Add `isFailure` var to `Issue` ### Motivation: This adds a variable to `Issue` in order to inspect if an issue isFailing. This will be nice when inspecting an issue after it is recorded. ### Modifications: - Add `isFailure` variable - Update existing code to use `isFailure` ### Checklist: - [x] Code and documentation should follow the style of the [Style Guide](https://github.com/apple/swift-testing/blob/main/Documentation/StyleGuide.md). - [x] If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should be updated.
This PR changes the `@Test` and `#expect()` macros so they handle `unsafe` expressions the same way `try` and `await` expressions are handled. The propagation rules for `unsafe` aren't the same as for `try` and `await` (i.e. it doesn't colour the calling function), but the general way we handle the keyword is the same. I haven't attempted to avoid inserting `unsafe` if a function is not marked `@unsafe` as it complicates the necessary logic but has no effects at runtime. ### Checklist: - [x] Code and documentation should follow the style of the [Style Guide](https://github.com/apple/swift-testing/blob/main/Documentation/StyleGuide.md). - [x] If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should be updated.
This PR implements an experimental form of state capture in exit tests. If you specify a capture list on the test's body closure and explicitly write the type of each captured value, _and_ each value conforms to `Sendable`, `Codable`, and (implicitly) `Copyable`, we'll encode them and send them "over the wire" to the child process: ```swift let a = Int.random(in: 100 ..< 200) await #expect(exitsWith: .failure) { [a = a as Int] in assert(a > 500) } ``` This PR is incomplete. Among other details: - [x] Need to properly transmit the data, not stuff it in an environment variable - [x] Need to implement diagnostics correctly - [x] Need to figure out if `ExitTest.CapturedValue` and `__Expression.Value` have any synergy. _(They do, but it's beyond the scope of this initial/experimental PR.)_ We are ultimately constrained by the language here as we don't have real type information for the captured values, nor can we infer captures by inspecting the syntax of the exit test body (hence the need for an explicit capture list with types.) If we had something like `decltype()` we could apply during macro expansion, you wouldn't need to write `x = x as T` and could just write `x`. The macro would use `decltype()` to produce a thunk function of the form: ```swift @sendable func __compiler_generated_name__(aʹ: decltype(a), bʹ: decltype(b), cʹ: decltype(c)) async throws { let (a, b, c) = (aʹ, bʹ, cʹ) try await { /* ... */ }() } ``` ### Checklist: - [x] Code and documentation should follow the style of the [Style Guide](https://github.com/apple/swift-testing/blob/main/Documentation/StyleGuide.md). - [x] If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should be updated.
…the compiler when SWT_NO_EXIT_TESTS is defined.
… when building for non-Embedded without a fallback condition (swiftlang#1081) This fixes an unintended side effect from swiftlang#1043 where the `SWT_NO_LEGACY_TEST_DISCOVERY` compilation conditional was being applied when building for non-Embedded. ### Checklist: - [x] Code and documentation should follow the style of the [Style Guide](https://github.com/apple/swift-testing/blob/main/Documentation/StyleGuide.md). - [x] If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should be updated.
…t`. (swiftlang#1076) This PR allows `DiscoverableAsTestContent.Context` to be less-aligned than `UInt` so long as its stride remains the same. It also removes the sneaky conformance of `ExitTest` to `DiscoverableAsTestContent`, opting instead to use an internal type. Since the conformance to `DiscoverableAsTestContent` and the implementation of `__store()` form a closed system (where all type information is controlled by Swift Testing at runtime), we can do this without breaking any ABI. I've updated ABI/TestContent.md to remove some of the relevant implementation details. ### Checklist: - [x] Code and documentation should follow the style of the [Style Guide](https://github.com/apple/swift-testing/blob/main/Documentation/StyleGuide.md). - [x] If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should be updated. --------- Co-authored-by: Stuart Montgomery <[email protected]>
…ry target (swiftlang#1082) This enables Library Evolution (LE) for the `_TestDiscovery` target in Swift package-based builds. The CMake-based build is already configured to enable LE for this target, so this is just matching behavior. (Note that we already enable LE for several other targets which vend public API as of swiftlang#951.) ### Checklist: - [x] Code and documentation should follow the style of the [Style Guide](https://github.com/apple/swift-testing/blob/main/Documentation/StyleGuide.md). - [x] If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should be updated.
…ting 6.1 development snapshot toolchains (swiftlang#1084) This fixes a build failure when attempting to build the `main` branch using a 6.1 development snapshot toolchain. This failure was introduced by swiftlang#1069, which added usage of the new `@unsafe` attribute, and the failure was revealed when we set up the 6.1 CI jobs in swiftlang#1083. Here are some relevant related Swift PRs which give context around these changes: - swiftlang/swift#75413 - swiftlang/swift#79645 See the code comment for more details. ### Checklist: - [x] Code and documentation should follow the style of the [Style Guide](https://github.com/apple/swift-testing/blob/main/Documentation/StyleGuide.md). - [x] If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should be updated.
@swift-ci please test |
briancroom
approved these changes
Apr 21, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
The macOS and Linux CI failures are expected to be resolved by swiftlang/swift#80830, but the release of a new |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This merges the
main
branch into therelease/6.2
branch.Once this PR has been merged, I will adjust the milestones on the PRs included in this merge to be 6.2 wherever appropriate.
Checklist: