Disable instrumentation when an integration throws a `MissingMethodException` #6807

andrewlock · 2025-04-01T17:09:39Z

Summary of changes

When an integration methods throws a MissingMethodException or MissingFieldException, disable the integration.

Reason for change

This scenario is most likely to occur when the app is trimmed (plus in some relatively obscure scenarios with binding redirects or strange deployments). In those cases, the exception will likely always be thrown, which could cause longer term issues. To fix, the customer should enable

Implementation details

Just as we do for "fatal" DuckTypeException or CallTargetInvokerExecption, disable the integration that generates the exception when this occurs.

Test coverage

I realised we don't have any tests (unit or integration) for the DuckTypeException behaviour, so added some, and added some for this behaviour too.

Other details

One slight issue came to mind. If we create a scope inside the OnBegin part of an integration, and then we hit this error, then we never close the scope, and will start leaking. I wonder if we could/should look to avoid that.

In the past, we only expected exceptions in the method when there were programming errors, so they should be relatively rare. But for trimming it's a different scenario, that's dependent on the customer, so maybe that's an issue?

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 · 2025-04-01T17:29:56Z

Datadog Report

Branch report: andrew/handle-missing-method
Commit report: 62ab6b4
Test service: dd-trace-dotnet

✅ 0 Failed, 256924 Passed, 2423 Skipped, 21h 10m 20.29s Total Time

andrewlock · 2025-04-01T17:43:38Z

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6807) - mean (70ms)  : 67, 73
     .   : milestone, 70,
    master - mean (70ms)  : 67, 72
     .   : milestone, 70,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6807) - mean (1,010ms)  : 987, 1034
     .   : milestone, 1010,
    master - mean (1,007ms)  : 984, 1030
     .   : milestone, 1007,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6807) - mean (103ms)  : 101, 106
     .   : milestone, 103,
    master - mean (103ms)  : 100, 105
     .   : milestone, 103,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6807) - mean (684ms)  : 665, 703
     .   : milestone, 684,
    master - mean (686ms)  : 664, 708
     .   : milestone, 686,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6807) - mean (90ms)  : 88, 93
     .   : milestone, 90,
    master - mean (90ms)  : 87, 92
     .   : milestone, 90,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6807) - mean (643ms)  : 630, 656
     .   : milestone, 643,
    master - mean (644ms)  : 630, 659
     .   : milestone, 644,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6807) - mean (189ms)  : 186, 193
     .   : milestone, 189,
    master - mean (190ms)  : 187, 193
     .   : milestone, 190,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6807) - mean (1,102ms)  : 1079, 1124
     .   : milestone, 1102,
    master - mean (1,108ms)  : 1071, 1144
     .   : milestone, 1108,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6807) - mean (268ms)  : 265, 272
     .   : milestone, 268,
    master - mean (269ms)  : 265, 273
     .   : milestone, 269,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6807) - mean (870ms)  : 840, 899
     .   : milestone, 870,
    master - mean (872ms)  : 844, 899
     .   : milestone, 872,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6807) - mean (261ms)  : 258, 265
     .   : milestone, 261,
    master - mean (262ms)  : 257, 266
     .   : milestone, 262,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6807) - mean (854ms)  : 822, 886
     .   : milestone, 854,
    master - mean (856ms)  : 826, 887
     .   : milestone, 856,

andrewlock · 2025-04-01T18:06:41Z

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmarks for #6807 compared to master:

1 benchmarks are faster, with geometric mean 1.123
2 benchmarks are slower, with geometric mean 1.118
All benchmarks have the same allocations

The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:

Mann–Whitney U test with statistical test for significance of 5%
Only results indicating a difference greater than 10% and 0.3 ns are considered.

Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.

Benchmark details

Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Gen 2	Allocated
master	`StartStopWithChild`	net6.0	7.86μs	43.6ns	265ns	0.0161	0.00401	0	5.61 KB
master	`StartStopWithChild`	netcoreapp3.1	10.3μs	49.3ns	221ns	0.0154	0.00514	0	5.8 KB
master	`StartStopWithChild`	net472	16.1μs	38.8ns	150ns	1.05	0.31	0.103	6.21 KB
#6807	`StartStopWithChild`	net6.0	7.87μs	45.3ns	357ns	0.0198	0.00793	0	5.61 KB
#6807	`StartStopWithChild`	netcoreapp3.1	9.93μs	53.4ns	302ns	0.0144	0.00481	0	5.8 KB
#6807	`StartStopWithChild`	net472	16.4μs	50.2ns	195ns	1.04	0.31	0.098	6.2 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	506μs	1.94μs	7.27μs	0	2.7 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	656μs	704ns	2.73μs	0	2.7 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	876μs	732ns	2.74μs	0.431	3.3 KB
#6807	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	483μs	351ns	1.36μs	0	2.7 KB
#6807	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	654μs	626ns	2.34μs	0	2.7 KB
#6807	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	850μs	833ns	3.23μs	0.425	3.3 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`SendRequest`	net6.0	129μs	390ns	1.51μs	0.197	14.47 KB
master	`SendRequest`	netcoreapp3.1	146μs	85.4ns	331ns	0.219	17.28 KB
master	`SendRequest`	net472	0.000386ns	0.000198ns	0.000767ns	0	0 b
#6807	`SendRequest`	net6.0	129μs	327ns	1.22μs	0.196	14.47 KB
#6807	`SendRequest`	netcoreapp3.1	147μs	458ns	1.77μs	0.22	17.27 KB
#6807	`SendRequest`	net472	0.000909ns	0.000428ns	0.00166ns	0	0 b

Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Gen 2	Allocated
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	596μs	3.33μs	28.6μs	0.566	0	0	41.66 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	678μs	3.83μs	26μs	0.349	0	0	41.61 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	871μs	2.8μs	10.5μs	8.04	2.23	0.446	53.28 KB
#6807	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	580μs	3.19μs	18.3μs	0.556	0	0	41.66 KB
#6807	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	731μs	4.54μs	44μs	0.357	0	0	41.73 KB
#6807	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	871μs	3.94μs	15.3μs	8.19	2.59	0.431	53.3 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Allocated
master	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net6.0	1.37μs	1.12ns	4.2ns	0.0143	0	1.02 KB
master	`ExecuteNonQuery`	netcoreapp3.1	1.8μs	2.39ns	8.96ns	0.0137	0	1.02 KB
master	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net472	2.09μs	2.9ns	11.2ns	0.156	0.00104	987 B
#6807	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net6.0	1.33μs	1.36ns	5.09ns	0.014	0	1.02 KB
#6807	`ExecuteNonQuery`	netcoreapp3.1	1.77μs	2.13ns	8.25ns	0.0132	0	1.02 KB
#6807	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net472	2.07μs	3.57ns	13.8ns	0.157	0.00104	987 B

Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #6807

Benchmark	base/diff	Base Median (ns)	Diff Median (ns)	Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch‑net6.0	1.123	1,313.57	1,169.89

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`CallElasticsearch`	net6.0	1.31μs	0.818ns	3.17ns	0.0132	976 B
master	`CallElasticsearch`	netcoreapp3.1	1.62μs	0.63ns	2.36ns	0.0129	976 B
master	`CallElasticsearch`	net472	2.67μs	1.07ns	4.16ns	0.158	995 B
master	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net6.0	1.26μs	0.863ns	3.34ns	0.0132	952 B
master	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.62μs	1.17ns	4.54ns	0.013	1.02 KB
master	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net472	2.6μs	0.759ns	2.94ns	0.167	1.05 KB
#6807	`CallElasticsearch`	net6.0	1.17μs	0.329ns	1.19ns	0.0135	976 B
#6807	`CallElasticsearch`	netcoreapp3.1	1.49μs	0.542ns	1.95ns	0.0135	976 B
#6807	`CallElasticsearch`	net472	2.64μs	1.16ns	4.48ns	0.157	995 B
#6807	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net6.0	1.3μs	0.435ns	1.63ns	0.0131	952 B
#6807	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.67μs	0.973ns	3.77ns	0.0141	1.02 KB
#6807	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net472	2.69μs	1.52ns	5.88ns	0.166	1.05 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`ExecuteAsync`	net6.0	1.33μs	0.48ns	1.8ns	0.0135	952 B
master	`ExecuteAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.69μs	1.81ns	6.78ns	0.0125	952 B
master	`ExecuteAsync`	net472	1.8μs	0.797ns	3.09ns	0.145	915 B
#6807	`ExecuteAsync`	net6.0	1.35μs	0.718ns	2.69ns	0.0135	952 B
#6807	`ExecuteAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.58μs	1.72ns	6.67ns	0.0126	952 B
#6807	`ExecuteAsync`	net472	1.76μs	0.658ns	2.46ns	0.145	915 B

Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`SendAsync`	net6.0	4.35μs	1.68ns	6.29ns	0.0325	2.31 KB
master	`SendAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	5.36μs	1.76ns	6.59ns	0.0373	2.85 KB
master	`SendAsync`	net472	7.5μs	2.35ns	9.08ns	0.492	3.12 KB
#6807	`SendAsync`	net6.0	4.35μs	1.86ns	6.96ns	0.0328	2.31 KB
#6807	`SendAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	5.58μs	3.99ns	15.5ns	0.0389	2.85 KB
#6807	`SendAsync`	net472	7.58μs	2.26ns	8.77ns	0.493	3.12 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #6807

Benchmark	diff/base	Base Median (ns)	Diff Median (ns)	Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog‑netcoreapp3.1	1.118	2,212.90	2,473.08

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	1.64μs	1.29ns	4.99ns	0.0239	1.69 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	2.21μs	1.26ns	4.7ns	0.0224	1.69 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	2.65μs	1.59ns	6.16ns	0.257	1.62 KB
#6807	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	1.6μs	1.07ns	3.87ns	0.024	1.69 KB
#6807	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	2.47μs	0.78ns	2.92ns	0.0222	1.69 KB
#6807	`EnrichedLog`	net472	2.48μs	1.31ns	5.06ns	0.258	1.62 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	111μs	93.3ns	349ns	0.0556	0	4.31 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	119μs	195ns	756ns	0	0	4.3 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	150μs	173ns	670ns	0.671	0.224	4.49 KB
#6807	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	112μs	130ns	503ns	0.0557	0	4.3 KB
#6807	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	118μs	109ns	421ns	0	0	4.3 KB
#6807	`EnrichedLog`	net472	149μs	195ns	756ns	0.67	0.223	4.49 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	2.98μs	0.801ns	3ns	0.0313	2.25 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	4.05μs	1.75ns	6.54ns	0.0303	2.25 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.79μs	1.93ns	6.69ns	0.328	2.07 KB
#6807	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	3.14μs	0.815ns	3.16ns	0.0314	2.25 KB
#6807	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	4.38μs	2.53ns	9.49ns	0.0303	2.25 KB
#6807	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.93μs	2.09ns	7.83ns	0.327	2.07 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`SendReceive`	net6.0	1.41μs	0.848ns	3.28ns	0.0163	1.14 KB
master	`SendReceive`	netcoreapp3.1	1.81μs	0.676ns	2.44ns	0.0154	1.14 KB
master	`SendReceive`	net472	2.14μs	1.19ns	4.59ns	0.183	1.16 KB
#6807	`SendReceive`	net6.0	1.32μs	0.781ns	2.92ns	0.0159	1.14 KB
#6807	`SendReceive`	netcoreapp3.1	1.74μs	0.76ns	2.94ns	0.0157	1.14 KB
#6807	`SendReceive`	net472	2.09μs	1.16ns	4.5ns	0.183	1.16 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	2.94μs	1.17ns	4.52ns	0.022	1.62 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	4.05μs	2.11ns	8.16ns	0.0223	1.67 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.4μs	2.11ns	7.91ns	0.326	2.07 KB
#6807	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	2.78μs	1.01ns	3.65ns	0.0223	1.62 KB
#6807	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	3.96μs	4.66ns	16.8ns	0.0216	1.67 KB
#6807	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.52μs	2.48ns	9.61ns	0.327	2.07 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`StartFinishSpan`	net6.0	402ns	0.551ns	2.06ns	0.00813	576 B
master	`StartFinishSpan`	netcoreapp3.1	573ns	0.353ns	1.37ns	0.00771	576 B
master	`StartFinishSpan`	net472	672ns	0.156ns	0.584ns	0.0918	578 B
master	`StartFinishScope`	net6.0	550ns	0.172ns	0.664ns	0.00987	696 B
master	`StartFinishScope`	netcoreapp3.1	760ns	4.09ns	22.7ns	0.00931	696 B
master	`StartFinishScope`	net472	918ns	0.441ns	1.65ns	0.104	658 B
#6807	`StartFinishSpan`	net6.0	405ns	0.119ns	0.461ns	0.00805	576 B
#6807	`StartFinishSpan`	netcoreapp3.1	571ns	0.503ns	1.95ns	0.00771	576 B
#6807	`StartFinishSpan`	net472	645ns	0.179ns	0.693ns	0.0917	578 B
#6807	`StartFinishScope`	net6.0	559ns	0.204ns	0.788ns	0.00974	696 B
#6807	`StartFinishScope`	netcoreapp3.1	729ns	0.506ns	1.96ns	0.00922	696 B
#6807	`StartFinishScope`	net472	917ns	0.809ns	3.13ns	0.104	658 B

Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #6807

Benchmark	diff/base	Base Median (ns)	Diff Median (ns)	Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin‑net6.0	1.119	601.25	672.61

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net6.0	601ns	0.204ns	0.79ns	0.0099	696 B
master	`RunOnMethodBegin`	netcoreapp3.1	966ns	0.582ns	2.25ns	0.00951	696 B
master	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net472	1.14μs	0.189ns	0.706ns	0.104	658 B
#6807	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net6.0	672ns	0.248ns	0.926ns	0.00975	696 B
#6807	`RunOnMethodBegin`	netcoreapp3.1	961ns	0.743ns	2.88ns	0.00929	696 B
#6807	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net472	1.15μs	0.646ns	2.5ns	0.104	658 B

tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/ClrProfiler/CallTarget/Handlers/IntegrationOptions.cs

…ptions

…rationOptions.cs Co-authored-by: Steven Bouwkamp <[email protected]>

## Summary of changes revert the revert of #6792 The missingMethodExceptions were most likely caused by a trimmed app ([see discussion](https://dd.slack.com/archives/C07TBLYDQHX/p1741907211362359)). We had some defense against this for _instrumented_ types, but not for duck-typed types, and this is where the issue laid. This was taken care of in #6807 for the generic case, and also after [talking with DSM](https://dd.slack.com/archives/C069TJPTFPG/p1743500681812779), they agree that we should try to instrument only user-defined protobufs, so I excluded the microsoft protobufs (that were causing the issue). Thus, this PR should be fine to merge as-is, even though it's best to merge it after #6807 for maximum safety. ## Reason for change ## Implementation details ## Test coverage ## Other details

andrewlock requested review from a team as code owners April 1, 2025 17:09

andrewlock changed the title ~~When an integration throws a MissingMethodException disable instrumentation~~ Disable instrumentation when an integration throws a MissingMethodException Apr 1, 2025

bouwkast approved these changes Apr 1, 2025

View reviewed changes

tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/ClrProfiler/CallTarget/Handlers/IntegrationOptions.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

kevingosse approved these changes Apr 2, 2025

View reviewed changes

andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/handle-missing-method branch from 25fac13 to d2fa8c8 Compare April 3, 2025 10:49

andrewlock and others added 6 commits April 3, 2025 11:50

Add additional metric tag for instrumentation errors

5489c27

Add support for disabling integration on MissingMemberException

6bb0478

Update trimming file

b099d52

Add integration tests for show-stopping exceptions like DuckType exce…

cfc4c66

…ptions

Update tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/ClrProfiler/CallTarget/Handlers/Integ…

b93c37d

…rationOptions.cs Co-authored-by: Steven Bouwkamp <[email protected]>

Add exclusions to test log error check

62ab6b4

andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/handle-missing-method branch from d2fa8c8 to 62ab6b4 Compare April 3, 2025 10:50

vandonr mentioned this pull request Apr 7, 2025

restore Protobuf instrumentation for schema tracking #6826

Merged

bouwkast merged commit f7d9b6c into master Apr 7, 2025
126 of 128 checks passed

bouwkast deleted the andrew/handle-missing-method branch April 7, 2025 15:06

github-actions bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Apr 7, 2025

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Disable instrumentation when an integration throws a `MissingMethodException` #6807

Disable instrumentation when an integration throws a `MissingMethodException` #6807

Uh oh!

andrewlock commented Apr 1, 2025

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 bot commented Apr 1, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

andrewlock commented Apr 1, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

andrewlock commented Apr 1, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Faster 🎉 in #6807

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Slower ⚠️ in #6807

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Slower ⚠️ in #6807

Raw results

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Disable instrumentation when an integration throws a MissingMethodException #6807

Disable instrumentation when an integration throws a MissingMethodException #6807

Uh oh!

Conversation

andrewlock commented Apr 1, 2025

Summary of changes

Reason for change

Implementation details

Test coverage

Other details

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 bot commented Apr 1, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Datadog Report

Uh oh!

andrewlock commented Apr 1, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Uh oh!

andrewlock commented Apr 1, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmark details

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Faster 🎉 in #6807

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Slower ⚠️ in #6807

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Slower ⚠️ in #6807

Raw results

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Disable instrumentation when an integration throws a `MissingMethodException` #6807

Disable instrumentation when an integration throws a `MissingMethodException` #6807

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 bot commented Apr 1, 2025 •

edited

Loading

andrewlock commented Apr 1, 2025 •

edited

Loading

andrewlock commented Apr 1, 2025 •

edited

Loading