-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
Use the new SciMLBenchmarks BuildKite system #398
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
We need to update this repo to use the new SciMLBenchmarks BuildKite system. |
Would you be interested in helping with that? |
Sure, I'll take a look at the .buildkite. I can also merge the changes from src/SciMLBenchmarks.jl into src/SciMLTutorials.jl |
If you have any questions, @staticfloat is the guy to ask. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #398 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 65.71% 78.68% +12.97%
===========================================
Files 1 1
Lines 70 61 -9
===========================================
+ Hits 46 48 +2
+ Misses 24 13 -11
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
This still isn't running the BuildKite runs. We also need to make the appropriate output repo. @staticfloat might need to take a look. |
If you haven't, you might need to set up a new pipeline for this repo |
Just created. |
minimal fix following patterns in https://github.com/SciML/SciMLBenchmarks.jl
took `pipeline.yml` and threw out https://github.com/SciML/SciMLBenchmarks.jl/blob/master/.buildkite/pipeline.yml#L4-L11 similar to SciML/SciMLBenchmarks.jl@cb55c25
Done in my third commit, though SciMLTutorialsOutput doesn't seem to exist yet |
The |
Oh snap, your branch was named master? 🤦 please don't do that. But haha that's fine. I setup the output repo, moved the webserver, and moved the outputs over to that. So hopefully things work? It's worth giving it a try. |
No description provided.