Skip to content

[8.18] [DOCS] Clean up more duplicated enum values (#4458) #4631

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 20, 2025

Conversation

lcawl
Copy link
Contributor

@lcawl lcawl commented Jun 19, 2025

Backport

This will backport the following commits from main to 8.18:

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

Copy link
Contributor

Following you can find the validation results for the APIs you have changed.

API Status Request Response
indices.clear_cache 🟢 4/4 4/4
indices.close 🟢 49/49 49/49
indices.delete 🟢 105/105 105/105
indices.exists_alias 🟢 38/38 38/38
indices.exists 🟢 39/39 39/39
indices.flush 🟢 41/41 41/41
indices.get_alias 🔴 82/82 73/82
indices.get_data_lifecycle Missing test Missing test
indices.get_field_mapping 🟢 15/15 15/15
indices.get_mapping 🟢 135/135 135/135
indices.open 🟢 20/20 20/20
indices.put_data_lifecycle Missing test Missing test
indices.put_mapping 🔴 112/116 119/119
indices.refresh 🟢 277/277 277/277
indices.resolve_cluster 🟢 13/13 13/13
indices.resolve_index 🟢 6/6 6/6
indices.segments 🔴 6/6 5/6
indices.validate_query 🟢 12/12 12/12
ml.put_job 🟢 227/227 225/225
ml.update_datafeed 🟢 7/7 7/7
open_point_in_time 🟢 7/7 7/7
search_shards 🟢 7/7 7/7
search_template 🟢 2/2 1/1
update_by_query 🟢 5/5 4/4

You can validate these APIs yourself by using the make validate target.

@lcawl lcawl requested a review from a team June 19, 2025 17:01
Copy link
Contributor

Following you can find the validation results for the APIs you have changed.

API Status Request Response
indices.clear_cache 🟢 4/4 4/4
indices.close 🟢 49/49 49/49
indices.delete 🟢 105/105 105/105
indices.exists_alias 🟢 38/38 38/38
indices.exists 🟢 39/39 39/39
indices.flush 🟢 41/41 41/41
indices.get_alias 🔴 82/82 73/82
indices.get_data_lifecycle Missing test Missing test
indices.get_field_mapping 🟢 15/15 15/15
indices.get_mapping 🟢 135/135 135/135
indices.open 🟢 20/20 20/20
indices.put_data_lifecycle Missing test Missing test
indices.put_mapping 🔴 112/116 119/119
indices.refresh 🟢 277/277 277/277
indices.resolve_cluster 🟢 13/13 13/13
indices.resolve_index 🟢 6/6 6/6
indices.segments 🔴 6/6 5/6
indices.validate_query 🟢 12/12 12/12
ml.put_job 🟢 227/227 225/225
ml.update_datafeed 🟢 7/7 7/7
open_point_in_time 🟢 7/7 7/7
search_shards 🟢 7/7 7/7
search_template 🟢 2/2 1/1
update_by_query 🟢 5/5 4/4

You can validate these APIs yourself by using the make validate target.

@lcawl lcawl force-pushed the backport/8.18/pr-4458 branch from c9b85d6 to 6590d0a Compare June 20, 2025 20:32
Copy link
Contributor

Following you can find the validation results for the APIs you have changed.

API Status Request Response
indices.clear_cache 🟢 4/4 4/4
indices.close 🟢 49/49 49/49
indices.delete 🟢 105/105 105/105
indices.exists_alias 🟢 38/38 38/38
indices.exists 🟢 39/39 39/39
indices.flush 🟢 41/41 41/41
indices.get_alias 🔴 82/82 73/82
indices.get_data_lifecycle Missing test Missing test
indices.get_field_mapping 🟢 15/15 15/15
indices.get_mapping 🟢 135/135 135/135
indices.open 🟢 20/20 20/20
indices.put_data_lifecycle Missing test Missing test
indices.put_mapping 🔴 112/116 119/119
indices.refresh 🟢 277/277 277/277
indices.resolve_cluster 🟢 13/13 13/13
indices.resolve_index 🟢 6/6 6/6
indices.segments 🔴 6/6 5/6
indices.validate_query 🟢 12/12 12/12
ml.put_job 🟢 227/227 225/225
ml.update_datafeed 🟢 7/7 7/7
open_point_in_time 🟢 7/7 7/7
search_shards 🟢 7/7 7/7
search_template 🟢 2/2 1/1
update_by_query 🟢 5/5 4/4

You can validate these APIs yourself by using the make validate target.

@lcawl lcawl merged commit 0f299fa into 8.18 Jun 20, 2025
7 checks passed
@lcawl lcawl deleted the backport/8.18/pr-4458 branch June 20, 2025 20:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants