Redefine the (|>) operator in a way to reveal passed types

[pkese]

When hovering over an |> operator with mouse cursor, I see the following information (in VSCode)

Notice that there is no information about the generic types that are involved.

If i redefine the |> operator as just

let (|>) arg func = func arg

..then when hovering over the opearator the same way, I get to see also the types that are involved

In terms of usability, seeing type information is an improvement, because in longer chains of |> workflows, it is sometimes hard to know what type is being passed around in each step. It would be nice if this was the default.

Please make the compiler service reveal inferred type wherever possible.

A starter solution would be to just replace the definition of operator definitions in the way as described above.

[Krzysztof-Cieslak]

Hey @7sharp9, is it connected to #896 ? (or the other things we've discussed on Slack)

[7sharp9]

Yes I think its connected @Krzysztof-Cieslak the types are not calculated for all operators properly.

[pkese]

Apparent'y this had been fixed in FCS in the meanwhile.