Skip to content

Java: Use nested names in MaD signatures. #14032

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 24, 2023

Conversation

aschackmull
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes https://github.com/github/codeql-java-team/issues/346

I've left a test query between the first two commits that I also used in a top 1000 MRVA run to find models that needed an update. I've updated those that I found in that run, except for the auto-generated jenkins models.

Copy link
Contributor

@atorralba atorralba left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming no changes in results, the code LGTM (I didn't go through all the changed models).

@aschackmull aschackmull merged commit 7af1e96 into github:main Aug 24, 2023
@aschackmull aschackmull deleted the java/mad-nestednames branch August 24, 2023 11:54
atorralba added a commit to atorralba/codeql that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2023
Re-generated the Jenkins and Stapler models to pick up the changes from github#14032
Copy link
Contributor

@michaelnebel michaelnebel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice @aschackmull !

---
category: minorAnalysis
---
* Fixed the MaD signature specifications to use proper nested type names.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants