Skip to content

Linuxkit v0.4 #83

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 22, 2018
Merged

Linuxkit v0.4 #83

merged 2 commits into from
May 22, 2018

Conversation

ijc
Copy link
Contributor

@ijc ijc commented May 22, 2018

Bumps everything to the Linuxkit v0.4 hashes. Ran ./scripts/update-linuxkit-hashes.sh v0.4 then updated .circle/config.yml by hand.

Ian Campbell added 2 commits May 22, 2018 10:21
Commit: 8d17887e1 Merge pull request #3037 from rn/rel_v0.4
Tag: v0.4

Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <[email protected]>
- linuxkit/runc:1b67e997c720301c62052c8f29f5629ad751199b
- linuxkit/containerd:87ea9b027267b26bf5cc2d10a50c3eb9b5017df4
- linuxkit/ca-certificates:fb5c7bf842a330f5b47cdf71f950fe0c85f4a772
- linuxkit/init:c79d7587fcd0a195b8a3ecafe428a30e735cf2b4
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm, shouldnt these be the linuxkit/init:v0.4 tagged versions?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We decided some time ago to use the hashes not the tags here, I forget why exactly.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems weird to do that...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#53:

Bump all hashes to those used in the v0.2 release. This uses the actual hashes rather than the tags since we aren't actually releasing this repository and I intend to keep tracking LinuxKit master, so using the tags would be temporary and perhaps misleading.

In any case I don't have cycles to rewrite the script to keep the tags at the moment.

@ijc
Copy link
Contributor Author

ijc commented May 22, 2018

LABELS: linux, Debian, testing, amd64
ID: 0af1af48-b75e-432d-b889-58a46eb2cffb
[PASS    ] kubernetes.smoke.cri-bridge 279.71s
[PASS    ] kubernetes.smoke.cri-weave 263.92s
[PASS    ] kubernetes.smoke.docker-bridge 278.97s
[PASS    ] kubernetes.smoke.docker-weave 257.60s
[SUMMARY ] LogDir: 0af1af48-b75e-432d-b889-58a46eb2cffb
[SUMMARY ] Version: testing
[SUMMARY ] Passed: 4
[SUMMARY ] Failed: 0
[SUMMARY ] Cancelled: 0
[SUMMARY ] Skipped: 0
[SUMMARY ] Duration: 1080.50s

pr83.zip

@ijc ijc merged commit 6e59d75 into linuxkit:master May 22, 2018
@ijc ijc deleted the linuxkit-v0.4 branch May 22, 2018 15:03
ijc pushed a commit to ijc/linuxkit-kubernetes that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2018
This reverts commit 7efaec5.

This is not needed since the update to Kubernetes 1.10.3 in linuxkit#83.

Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants