Skip to content

RuntimeLibcalls: Fix calling conv of win32 div libcalls #149098

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

arsenm
Copy link
Contributor

@arsenm arsenm commented Jul 16, 2025

There's probably an existing test this should be added to,
but our test coverage is really bad that this wasn't caught
by one.

There's probably an existing test this should be added to,
but our test coverage is really bad that this wasn't caught
by one.
Copy link
Contributor Author

arsenm commented Jul 16, 2025

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jul 16, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-ir
@llvm/pr-subscribers-platform-windows

@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86

Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm)

Changes

There's probably an existing test this should be added to,
but our test coverage is really bad that this wasn't caught
by one.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149098.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td (+1-1)
  • (added) llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/win32-int-runtime-libcalls.ll (+72)
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
index 11926d4128fcf..f0297cd1a0873 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
@@ -2129,7 +2129,7 @@ defvar X86CommonLibcalls =
 );
 
 defvar Windows32DivRemMulCalls =
-  LibcallImpls<(add WindowsDivRemMulLibcalls),
+  LibcallsWithCC<(add WindowsDivRemMulLibcalls), X86_STDCALL,
   RuntimeLibcallPredicate<"TT.isWindowsMSVCEnvironment() || TT.isWindowsItaniumEnvironment()">>;
 
 def X86_32SystemLibrary
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/win32-int-runtime-libcalls.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/win32-int-runtime-libcalls.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..86f24ebf6ce86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/win32-int-runtime-libcalls.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=i686-windows-msvc < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+define i64 @test_sdiv_i64(i64 %a, i64 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test_sdiv_i64:
+; CHECK:       # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    pushl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    pushl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    pushl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    pushl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    calll __alldiv
+; CHECK-NEXT:    retl
+  %ret = sdiv i64 %a, %b
+  ret i64 %ret
+}
+
+define i64 @test_srem_i64(i64 %a, i64 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test_srem_i64:
+; CHECK:       # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    pushl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    pushl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    pushl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    pushl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    calll __allrem
+; CHECK-NEXT:    retl
+  %ret = srem i64 %a, %b
+  ret i64 %ret
+}
+
+define i64 @test_udiv_i64(i64 %a, i64 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test_udiv_i64:
+; CHECK:       # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    pushl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    pushl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    pushl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    pushl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    calll __aulldiv
+; CHECK-NEXT:    retl
+  %ret = udiv i64 %a, %b
+  ret i64 %ret
+}
+
+define i64 @test_urem_i64(i64 %a, i64 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test_urem_i64:
+; CHECK:       # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    pushl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    pushl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    pushl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    pushl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    calll __aullrem
+; CHECK-NEXT:    retl
+  %ret = urem i64 %a, %b
+  ret i64 %ret
+}
+
+define i64 @test_mul_i64(i64 %a, i64 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test_mul_i64:
+; CHECK:       # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    pushl %esi
+; CHECK-NEXT:    movl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %ecx
+; CHECK-NEXT:    movl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %esi
+; CHECK-NEXT:    movl %ecx, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT:    mull %esi
+; CHECK-NEXT:    imull {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %ecx
+; CHECK-NEXT:    addl %ecx, %edx
+; CHECK-NEXT:    imull {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %esi
+; CHECK-NEXT:    addl %esi, %edx
+; CHECK-NEXT:    popl %esi
+; CHECK-NEXT:    retl
+  %ret = mul i64 %a, %b
+  ret i64 %ret
+}

@arsenm arsenm marked this pull request as ready for review July 16, 2025 13:31
Copy link
Member

@compnerd compnerd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add a test for x64 that ensures that is also called correctly (no stdcall)?

Copy link
Member

@mstorsjo mstorsjo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! This does fix all my observed issues.

@RKSimon RKSimon requested a review from rnk July 16, 2025 16:22
@arsenm arsenm merged commit 0110168 into main Jul 16, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@arsenm arsenm deleted the users/arsenm/runtime-libcalls/fix-callingconv-win32-div-libcalls branch July 16, 2025 23:29
@arsenm arsenm added this to the LLVM 21.x Release milestone Jul 17, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Needs Triage in LLVM Release Status Jul 17, 2025
@arsenm
Copy link
Contributor Author

arsenm commented Jul 17, 2025

/cherry-pick 0110168

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jul 17, 2025

/pull-request #149246

@llvmbot llvmbot moved this from Needs Triage to Done in LLVM Release Status Jul 17, 2025
nikic pushed a commit to nikic/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2025
There's probably an existing test this should be added to,
but our test coverage is really bad that this wasn't caught
by one.
tru pushed a commit to llvmbot/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2025
There's probably an existing test this should be added to,
but our test coverage is really bad that this wasn't caught
by one.

(cherry picked from commit 0110168)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants