Handle pre-commit deps and more renovate options #482
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@lucacome has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 28 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several new test cases in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant C as Client
participant G as groupDependencyUpdates
participant P as UpdatePatterns
C->>G: call groupDependencyUpdates(sections)
loop For each update in sections
G->>P: Check update against pattern
P-->>G: Match result (or no match)
end
G->>G: Group updates based on matched patterns
G-->>C: Return organized section data
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/notes.ts (4)
291-293: Elaborate which services are classified as "automated services".
This docstring mentions "automated services" in passing. It might help future readers if you clarify which ones are currently supported (Renovate, Dependabot, pre-commit-ci, etc.) and highlight that additional services can be plugged in.
361-373: Consider renaming "originalName" for clarity.
WhileoriginalNameworks, a name likedependencyNameororiginalDependencyNamemay be clearer.interface UpdateGroup { - originalName: string + dependencyName: string latestVersion: string initialVersion: string ... }
374-424: Prevent repeated matching attempts across patterns for the same line.
Currently, if a line matches any pattern, you markmatched = trueand break from the loop. Ensure that future expansions won't require partial matches from multiple patterns for the same line, or cause confusion if multiple patterns could apply.
402-508: Extract version comparison logic into a dedicated helper.
The version comparison and fallback approach is robust but scattered and lengthy. Consider extracting it into a separate function or utility module to keep the main loop simpler and more digestible.// Example refactor snippet: - // inline logic for version comparison + // external function, e.g. compareVersionsOrFallback(current, incoming, patternName) // Then inside your loop: group.latestVersion = compareVersionsOrFallback(group.latestVersion, latestVersion, pattern.name)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
dist/index.jsis excluded by!**/dist/**dist/index.js.mapis excluded by!**/dist/**,!**/*.mapdist/notes.d.tsis excluded by!**/dist/**
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
__tests__/notes.test.ts(1 hunks)src/notes.ts(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/notes.ts (1)
301-353: Confirm that multiple matches for a single line are impossible.
YourupdatePatternsarray is quite flexible. However, if a single changelog line accidentally matches more than one pattern, the loop short-circuits at the first match. This might cause corner cases if new patterns overlap.You can verify that each line properly matches only one pattern by adding specialized test cases or by searching for lines that match multiple patterns. If you need help constructing a script or test, let me know!
__tests__/notes.test.ts (5)
451-484: Good coverage for pre-commit-ci grouping.
Nice job adding a dedicated test to ensure that multiple pre-commit-ci updates are consolidated in one entry. This test thoroughly checks that entries are merged only within the same section.
486-508: Mixed dependency updates are validated correctly.
This test effectively checks interactions between pre-commit-ci and other dependency updates in the same section. Great demonstration of how the aggregator handles multiple patterns at once.
510-531: Kudos for verifying separation of identical services across sections.
Your test ensures that updates for the same service in different sections remain separate. This prevents unintended merges across categories.
533-563: Lock file maintenance grouping is comprehensive.
You’ve confirmed that multiple lock file maintenance updates in a single section get combined, which aligns with the pattern-based approach. Good coverage of renovate lock file updates.
565-590: Robust testing for mixing lock file maintenance with other updates.
This test completes the matrix by verifying that lock file maintenance updates and other patterns can coexist and still properly merge. Coverage looks excellent.
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
1 similar comment
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/notes.ts (3)
301-353: Regex-based patterns for multiple automated services.The definitions look clean and extensible. As a minor improvement, consider adding a fallback pattern for cases not matching the existing regex to avoid accidental omission of updates.
479-550: Version comparison approach looks robust.
isNewerVersionemploys multiple fallback strategies for semver and non-semver values. As a minor refinement, consider extending coverage to handle pre-release tags (e.g.,1.0.0-alpha) more precisely if needed.
552-593: Earliest version detection in Dependabot flow.
isEarlierVersionis logically sound; it falls back gracefully when semver parsing fails. If your pipeline eventually needs to handle elaborate version strings (with dashes or additional segments), consider broadening the matching strategy.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
dist/index.jsis excluded by!**/dist/**dist/index.js.mapis excluded by!**/dist/**,!**/*.mapdist/notes.d.tsis excluded by!**/dist/**
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
__tests__/notes.test.ts(1 hunks)src/notes.ts(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
__tests__/notes.test.ts (5)
451-484: Great test coverage for pre-commit-ci grouping.No issues found. The test scenario is clearly defined and verifies the grouping logic thoroughly.
486-508: Mixed dependency updates test looks solid.The test setup and assertions accurately cover scenarios where multiple update sources must be grouped.
510-530: Pre-commit updates are properly separated across sections.No concerns; the test ensures that updates remain isolated in each relevant section.
533-563: Lock file maintenance grouping test is well-structured.The logic for consolidating lock file maintenance entries is verified in this test without redundant checks.
565-590: Comprehensive coverage for mixed updates with lock file maintenance.The test ensures correct grouping of lock file maintenance alongside other types of updates.
src/notes.ts (4)
291-291: Documentation clarified.Thanks for expanding the doc comment to explicitly mention automated services.
361-373: Interface and map usage for grouping updates.The data structures are clearly defined; this approach promotes maintainability.
377-430: First pass logic is clear and methodical.Iterating over each pattern to gather update info and then breaking upon a match is efficient. No immediate issues detected.
431-473: Second pass consolidation.This section effectively avoids duplicating the same group’s output and preserves original order for non-automated items.
Docstrings generation was requested by @lucacome. * #482 (comment) The following files were modified: * `src/notes.ts`
|
Note Generated docstrings for this pull request at #483 |
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit