-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
Closed
Labels
Fix AvailableA PR has been opened for this issueA PR has been opened for this issueNeeds InvestigationThis issue needs a team member to investigate its status.This issue needs a team member to investigate its status.
Milestone
Description
Bug Report
🔎 Search Terms
impliedNodeFormat
🕗 Version & Regression Information
branch packageJsonWatch
- I was unable to test this on prior versions because:
- might not expect
impliedNodeFormat
to be set correctly in earlier versions
- might not expect
⏯ Playground Link
Not possible
💻 Code
The documentation for SourceFile["impliedNodeFormat"]
says
/**
* When `module` is `Node12` or `NodeNext`, this field controls whether the
* source file in question is an ESNext-output-format file, or a CommonJS-output-format
* module. This is derived by the module resolver as it looks up the file, since
* it is derived from either the file extension of the module, or the containing
* `package.json` context, and affects both checking and emit.
*
* It is _public_ so that (pre)transformers can set this field,
* since it switches the builtin `node` module transform. Generally speaking, if unset,
* the field is treated as though it is `ModuleKind.CommonJS`.
*/
impliedNodeFormat?: ModuleKind.ESNext | ModuleKind.CommonJS;
however, in a unittest is was found that setting
- setting compilerOptions:module to "Node12" did NOT result in "impliedNodeFormat" being set correctly
- setting compilerOptions:moduleResolution to "Node12", while leaving compilerOptions:module unset, DID result in "impliedNodeFormat" being set correctly
🙁 Actual Current In-code Documentation
Need to set compilerOptions:module
It is the in-code documentation that needs to change.
🙂 Actual Behavior
Need to set compilerOptions:moduleResolution
Test
I set up a unittest in a pull to the packageWatchJson branch. #48958 which shows that moduleResolution set to Node12 works correctly.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Fix AvailableA PR has been opened for this issueA PR has been opened for this issueNeeds InvestigationThis issue needs a team member to investigate its status.This issue needs a team member to investigate its status.