Disallow statements between overloads #317
Conversation
| "category": "Error", | ||
| "code": 2239 | ||
| }, | ||
| "Constructor implementation is missing.": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This error message was changed from "Constructor implementation expected." to "Constructor implementation is missing.". Given that error is usually reported on the line that contains the last overload wording "Constructor implementation expected." is not clear enough to explain what went wrong (should I create implementation instead of this overloads? But what if I need this overloads? etc...). In opposite "Constructor implementation is missing." implies that this overload itself is ok but it lacks implementation and thus error is reported
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems too generic, the problem may not be a missing implementation per se but an implementation that is separated from the declaration.. so something like "Function implementation is missing or not immediately following the declaration", or "Function implementation is expected to follow the declaration" .. etc..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ok, makes sense. I'll change it to "Function implementation is missing or not immediately following the declaration"
|
👍 |
Ensure that overloads are consecutive when checking functions.
this fixes #75 and #92