-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 68
[IMP] util.update_record_from_xml #289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
KangOl
wants to merge
1
commit into
odoo:master
Choose a base branch
from
odoo-dev:master-xml_filename-chs
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if we now need the
found
variable? We can keep the xml_filename as the "found" signal whenever it's set. Maybe namedfound_in_xml_file
?There is a slight subtlety. We do not break the search loop when found. Thus in practice we keep searching and adding nodes to our new root. This means that we will be lying if we keep the same filename when loading our new root. Maybe we should have a
new_root
perfound_in_xml_file
, a sort of mapfilename->new_root
. We should double check the standard behavior if we really care about this.EDIT: This is obviously a corner case since it's a mistake to have two records with same xmlid redefined in the same module in xml. But this has been actually seen before. Aligning with standard code would be "saner" even for the corner case.