Skip to content

Move nightly CI tests to the main branch #844

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2023

Conversation

PatKamin
Copy link
Contributor

@PatKamin PatKamin commented Sep 1, 2023

Fuzz tests set up with cron don't run because cron scheduled workflows are triggered only for the default branch.
Add nightly workflow file to the default branch with fuzz tests specified to run on 'adapters' branch.

Copy link
Contributor

@lukaszstolarczuk lukaszstolarczuk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a little "heh", as we discussed (if we introduce any change in fuzzing tests execution on adapters branch, this workflow should be updated on a sep. PR to the main branch), but it looks clean and hopefully will work :)

Please remove after that the nightly.yml from the adapters branch, I guess.

@lukaszstolarczuk
Copy link
Contributor

@PatKamin, actually, did you test this on your fork (e.g., on push trigger)?

@PatKamin
Copy link
Contributor Author

PatKamin commented Sep 1, 2023

@PatKamin, actually, did you test this on your fork (e.g., on push trigger)?

Turned the PR to draft until I verify on my fork with cron schedule.

Fuzz tests set up with cron don't run because cron scheduled workflows
are triggered only for the default branch.
Add nightly workflow file to the default branch with fuzz tests
specified to run on 'adapters' branch.
@PatKamin PatKamin marked this pull request as ready for review September 1, 2023 13:14
@pbalcer pbalcer merged commit 022bbae into oneapi-src:main Sep 4, 2023
@PatKamin PatKamin deleted the fix-nightly-tests branch June 26, 2024 10:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants