Skip to content

service resource attributes #39335

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 30 commits into from
May 20, 2025

Conversation

zeitlinger
Copy link
Member

second part of #37114

@zeitlinger
Copy link
Member Author

@dmitryax @ChrsMark here is the second part - service attributes - please have a look 😄

@@ -241,6 +245,8 @@ type ExtractionRules struct {

Annotations []FieldExtractionRule
Labels []FieldExtractionRule

Service bool
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just Service can be misleading. Can we use sth more explicit like ServiceAttributes instead?

@zeitlinger
Copy link
Member Author

@ChrsMark thanks for the review - I replied

@zeitlinger zeitlinger force-pushed the automatic-resource-attributes branch from 4a10785 to f46e096 Compare April 22, 2025 12:19
@zeitlinger
Copy link
Member Author

@ChrsMark fixed (the changelog failure is a false positive)

Copy link
Member

@ChrsMark ChrsMark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ChrsMark
Copy link
Member

ChrsMark commented May 5, 2025

@dmitryax could you also take a look so we can unblock this one?

@zeitlinger zeitlinger force-pushed the automatic-resource-attributes branch from 90ecd28 to 0a574d1 Compare May 16, 2025 10:28
@dmitryax dmitryax merged commit 5b477f5 into open-telemetry:main May 20, 2025
175 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the next release milestone May 20, 2025
dragonlord93 pushed a commit to dragonlord93/opentelemetry-collector-contrib that referenced this pull request May 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants