Skip to content

[RFC] Simplifying stateful behavior #13224

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

VihasMakwana
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR adds a new RFC to simplify enabling statefulness. It is a part of open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib#35013.

An open question to folks is:

Which directory to use for storing offsets if the feature gate is enabled?

Link to tracking issue

Relates open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib#35013

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.53%. Comparing base (8d71881) to head (4f69126).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #13224      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.51%   91.53%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         522      522              
  Lines       28988    28988              
==========================================
+ Hits        26529    26533       +4     
+ Misses       1939     1936       -3     
+ Partials      520      519       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@VihasMakwana
Copy link
Contributor Author

VihasMakwana commented Jun 18, 2025

@mx-psi @dmitryax @bogdandrutu @codeboten I'll announce this RFC in today's SIG.
I suppose most of you wouldn't join due to timezone differences. I'd love to hear your thoughts.

I'll try my best to join next iteration of SIG i.e. the one occurring at 9:00 PT.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant