-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.7k
DOC: Fixed examples in pandas/core/groupby/
#33230
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
WillAyd
merged 8 commits into
pandas-dev:master
from
ShaharNaveh:DOC-DocTests-core-groupby
Apr 10, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c4590a3
Fixed examples in `pandas/core/groupby/`
9d2930d
Fixed CI issues
d352ad8
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into DOC-DocTests-core…
1fad1fb
Moved doctest check to the correct place
874ccb5
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into DOC-DocTests-core…
4f1b138
Displaying text as code block
eac87ac
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into DOC-DocTests-core…
c103686
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into DOC-DocTests-core…
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this still render as code when you build the docs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch!
Fixed in 4f1b138
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is keeping this as it was not an option? I don’t think we add code-blocks to docstring normally since they are oriented more towards generated HTML / PDF output and aren’t super useful in say a shell
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only solution that comes to my mind is to add
# doctest: +SKIP
to this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jreback do you know how we typically handle these? I don't think we use code-block in docstrings do we?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@WillAyd We actually do: (although I'm not sure if this is wanted)
pandas/pandas/core/accessor.py
Lines 223 to 266 in cabc31a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
May be using triple backticks? Otherwise, a skip seems reasonable. Or may be @jorisvandenbossche has a better idea.