Package refactor

[Jawnnypoo]

• Move from com.parse to com.parse.livequery
• Distribute with JitPack and use JitPack dependency of Parse-SDK

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #88 into master will increase coverage by 0.39%.
The diff coverage is 62.5%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master      #88      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     71.96%   72.35%   +0.39%     
  Complexity       84       84              
============================================
  Files            11       11              
  Lines           371      369       -2     
  Branches         25       24       -1     
============================================
  Hits            267      267              
+ Misses           88       86       -2     
  Partials         16       16

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
...n/java/com/parse/livequery/LiveQueryException.java	51.85% <ø> (ø)	2 <0> (?)
.../com/parse/livequery/SubscribeClientOperation.java	100% <ø> (ø)	2 <0> (?)
...rc/main/java/com/parse/livequery/Subscription.java	97.5% <ø> (ø)	17 <0> (?)
...java/com/parse/livequery/SubscriptionHandling.java	100% <ø> (ø)	0 <0> (?)
...java/com/parse/livequery/ParseLiveQueryClient.java	16.66% <ø> (ø)	0 <0> (?)
...om/parse/livequery/OkHttp3SocketClientFactory.java	32.65% <ø> (ø)	2 <0> (?)
...main/java/com/parse/livequery/WebSocketClient.java	100% <ø> (ø)	0 <0> (?)
...om/parse/livequery/UnsubscribeClientOperation.java	100% <100%> (ø)	2 <1> (?)
...main/java/com/parse/livequery/ClientOperation.java	100% <100%> (ø)	1 <1> (?)
...va/com/parse/livequery/ConnectClientOperation.java	100% <100%> (ø)	2 <1> (?)
... and 1 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4fb2aed...a6d6b58. Read the comment docs.

[Jawnnypoo]

@mmimeault Do you think you can review this for me?

[mmimeault]

The refactor looks good.
For the jitpack part I can't judge, I will trust you on that one.

Just for your information about the /* package */ you removed in the code:
I started using that after seeing that in some projects. Normally you are really explicit with "public" or "private", but when you want to be "package", having no keyword is not "explicit'. You don't if it's a mistake or on purpose. Since I found that nice trick /* package */, I'm using it. And since I started this project from 0, I thought it would be nice for the open source community.

[Jawnnypoo]

I see. Yeah, that makes sense about /* package */. The problem that I have seen with Parse-SDK-Android and the reason I have been removing it from there is that it completely throws off the JavaDocs and makes them unassociated from whatever method/class/field you are attempted to place them on.