stdlib.rst: mathematics section: random.random: add detail to comment on range of random.random() #111868
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… on range of random.random()
bedevere-app
bot
added
awaiting review
docs
Missing article
rhettinger
approved these changes
Nov 9, 2023
aisk
pushed a commit
to aisk/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2024
--------- Co-authored-by: Raymond Hettinger <[email protected]>
Glyphack
pushed a commit
to Glyphack/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2024
--------- Co-authored-by: Raymond Hettinger <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit adds a detail to a comment about
random.random(). Before this commit, a comment saysrandom.random()returns arandom float. After this commit, that comment saysrandom.random()returns arandom float from interval (0.0, 1.0].I propose to add this detail to the comment because it clarifies (for me) what the function returns.
However, this comment occurs in a 'brief tour', and the guide for a brief tour can be terse and expect the reader to go read the relevant page (e.g. in this case, https://docs.python.org/3/library/random.html#random.random) if the reader wants to know more than an overview offers. Given that view, the detail I add in this commit is not warranted.
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--111868.org.readthedocs.build/