Skip to content

[3.6] bpo-21060 Improve error message for "setup.py upload" without dist files (GH-5726) #5747

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2018

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Feb 18, 2018

(cherry picked from commit 08a6926)

Co-authored-by: Éric Araujo [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue21060

@Mariatta
Copy link
Member

The commit message was wrong: It should be include bpo-21060 and the original PR number GH-5726. Please update that too for the other backport PRs.

@merwok
Copy link
Member

merwok commented Feb 19, 2018

Ok! I thought the new bpo-nnn style was recommended but the older shorter style #NNN still working.

@merwok merwok changed the title [3.6] Improve error message for "setup.py upload" without dist files (GH-21060) [3.6] bpo-21060 Improve error message for "setup.py upload" without dist files (GH-21060) Feb 19, 2018
@Mariatta
Copy link
Member

That old style works in bpo but not in GitHub :)

@merwok
Copy link
Member

merwok commented Feb 19, 2018

Yes I don’t expect github to create links to bpo but custom bots could do what they want.

I prefer bug tracker-neutral references like «#1234» that humans understand over site-specific «sf1234» or the ugly «issue1234». Also I used to try to keep the first line of commit logs short! But next time I’ll follow what works with the bots.

@Mariatta Mariatta changed the title [3.6] bpo-21060 Improve error message for "setup.py upload" without dist files (GH-21060) [3.6] bpo-21060 Improve error message for "setup.py upload" without dist files (GH-5726) Feb 19, 2018
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@merwok: Backport status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

@Mariatta
Copy link
Member

PR title fixed. It needs to reference the PR on master, so bedevere can properly remove the label.

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@merwok: Backport status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 2a93fae into python:3.6 Feb 19, 2018
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks!

@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-08a6926-3.6 branch February 19, 2018 04:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants