Skip to content

bpo-38101: Update devguide triaging keywords #570

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Feb 23, 2020
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions triaging.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -375,6 +375,18 @@ Various informational flags about the issue. Multiple values are possible.
| easy | Fixing the issue should not take longer than a day for |
| | someone new to contributing to Python to solve. |
+---------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
| easy (C) | Fixing the issue should not take longer than a day for |
| | someone new contributing to Python, focused on C. |
+---------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
| security_issue| The issue would fit as, or is related as a security issue. |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
| security_issue| The issue would fit as, or is related as a security issue. |
| security_issue| This is a security issue or is related to one. |

| | The main difference from "security" is that this is a |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"security" is out of context here, so maybe write something "The main difference from the "secutiry" issue type is..."

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added both changes, I think also since there is no security keyword in the bug tracker, the main difference is that is a definite problem right? While the security type above it is more for reporting a possible issue.

| | definite security problem that has to be dealt with. |
+---------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
| PEP 3121 | The issue fit as, or is related to the PEP 3121 module |
| | Which is the Extension Module Initialization and |
| | Finalization, For More information: |
| | https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3121/ |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The wording and capitalization here are a bit clumsy. My suggestion:

"The issue is related to `PEP 3121`_: Extension Module Initialization and Finalization."

(The above assumes adding the link for PEP 3121 below it.)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have made the requested changes; please review again

+---------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
| newcomer | Issue suitable for newcomer/first time contributors. |
| friendly | Not suitable for experienced contributors. Typically it is |
| | straightforward, well-defined, low-risk, and optionally |
Expand Down