-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.5k
Add target maintainer information for mips64-unknown-linux-muslabi64 #143622
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add target maintainer information for mips64-unknown-linux-muslabi64 #143622
Conversation
The mips64-unknown-linux-muslabi64 target is currently rather broken, but I'm working on getting it fixed so that it can at least be used again. While I can't commit to maintaining the LLVM side of this target, I don't mind looking into any other MIPS or musl-related issues that arise with this target. Signed-off-by: Jens Reidel <[email protected]>
r? @SparrowLii rustbot has assigned @SparrowLii. Use |
Some changes occurred in src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support cc @Noratrieb |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for signing up!
r? jieyouxu @bors r+ rollup |
…labi64-target-maintainer, r=jieyouxu Add target maintainer information for mips64-unknown-linux-muslabi64 The `mips64-unknown-linux-muslabi64` target is currently rather broken, but I'm working on getting it fixed so that it can at least be used again. While I can't commit to maintaining the LLVM side of this target, I don't mind looking into any other MIPS or musl-related issues that arise with this target. See e.g. rust-lang#143409 for some rustc fixes I have in the pipeline and rust-lang/libc#4509, rust-lang/libc#4527, rust-lang/libc#4528, rust-lang/libc#4529, rust-lang/libc#4530 for fixing the libc definitions for this target. I'm adding myself as a maintainer mostly due to [this interaction](rust-lang/libc#4530 (comment)). LLVM support has been a concern for these targets in the past, but it shouldn't hurt to have a nominal maintainer for these even if they remain tier 3. From my experience, LLVM for MIPS is working well nowadays unless you decide to use LLD, which is horribly broken on MIPS.
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #134628 (Make `Default` const and add some `const Default` impls) - #143555 (Don't mark `#[target_feature]` safe fns as unsafe in rustdoc JSON.) - #143600 (Update intro blurb in `wasm32-wasip1` docs) - #143603 (Clarify the meaning of `AttributeOrder::KeepFirst` and `AttributeOrder::KeepLast`) - #143620 (fix: Remove newline from multiple crate versions note) - #143622 (Add target maintainer information for mips64-unknown-linux-muslabi64) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #134628 (Make `Default` const and add some `const Default` impls) - #143555 (Don't mark `#[target_feature]` safe fns as unsafe in rustdoc JSON.) - #143600 (Update intro blurb in `wasm32-wasip1` docs) - #143603 (Clarify the meaning of `AttributeOrder::KeepFirst` and `AttributeOrder::KeepLast`) - #143620 (fix: Remove newline from multiple crate versions note) - #143622 (Add target maintainer information for mips64-unknown-linux-muslabi64) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #134628 (Make `Default` const and add some `const Default` impls) - #143555 (Don't mark `#[target_feature]` safe fns as unsafe in rustdoc JSON.) - #143600 (Update intro blurb in `wasm32-wasip1` docs) - #143603 (Clarify the meaning of `AttributeOrder::KeepFirst` and `AttributeOrder::KeepLast`) - #143620 (fix: Remove newline from multiple crate versions note) - #143622 (Add target maintainer information for mips64-unknown-linux-muslabi64) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
…labi64-target-maintainer, r=jieyouxu Add target maintainer information for mips64-unknown-linux-muslabi64 The `mips64-unknown-linux-muslabi64` target is currently rather broken, but I'm working on getting it fixed so that it can at least be used again. While I can't commit to maintaining the LLVM side of this target, I don't mind looking into any other MIPS or musl-related issues that arise with this target. See e.g. rust-lang#143409 for some rustc fixes I have in the pipeline and rust-lang/libc#4509, rust-lang/libc#4527, rust-lang/libc#4528, rust-lang/libc#4529, rust-lang/libc#4530 for fixing the libc definitions for this target. I'm adding myself as a maintainer mostly due to [this interaction](rust-lang/libc#4530 (comment)). LLVM support has been a concern for these targets in the past, but it shouldn't hurt to have a nominal maintainer for these even if they remain tier 3. From my experience, LLVM for MIPS is working well nowadays unless you decide to use LLD, which is horribly broken on MIPS.
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #143402 (Port several linking (linkage?) related attributes the new attribute system ) - #143555 (Don't mark `#[target_feature]` safe fns as unsafe in rustdoc JSON.) - #143593 (Port #[rustc_dummy]) - #143600 (Update intro blurb in `wasm32-wasip1` docs) - #143603 (Clarify the meaning of `AttributeOrder::KeepFirst` and `AttributeOrder::KeepLast`) - #143606 (configure.py: Write last key in each section) - #143620 (fix: Remove newline from multiple crate versions note) - #143622 (Add target maintainer information for mips64-unknown-linux-muslabi64) Failed merges: - #143403 (Port several trait/coherence-related attributes the new attribute system) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #143402 (Port several linking (linkage?) related attributes the new attribute system ) - #143555 (Don't mark `#[target_feature]` safe fns as unsafe in rustdoc JSON.) - #143593 (Port #[rustc_dummy]) - #143600 (Update intro blurb in `wasm32-wasip1` docs) - #143603 (Clarify the meaning of `AttributeOrder::KeepFirst` and `AttributeOrder::KeepLast`) - #143620 (fix: Remove newline from multiple crate versions note) - #143622 (Add target maintainer information for mips64-unknown-linux-muslabi64) Failed merges: - #143403 (Port several trait/coherence-related attributes the new attribute system) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of #143622 - Gelbpunkt:mips64-unknown-linux-muslabi64-target-maintainer, r=jieyouxu Add target maintainer information for mips64-unknown-linux-muslabi64 The `mips64-unknown-linux-muslabi64` target is currently rather broken, but I'm working on getting it fixed so that it can at least be used again. While I can't commit to maintaining the LLVM side of this target, I don't mind looking into any other MIPS or musl-related issues that arise with this target. See e.g. #143409 for some rustc fixes I have in the pipeline and rust-lang/libc#4509, rust-lang/libc#4527, rust-lang/libc#4528, rust-lang/libc#4529, rust-lang/libc#4530 for fixing the libc definitions for this target. I'm adding myself as a maintainer mostly due to [this interaction](rust-lang/libc#4530 (comment)). LLVM support has been a concern for these targets in the past, but it shouldn't hurt to have a nominal maintainer for these even if they remain tier 3. From my experience, LLVM for MIPS is working well nowadays unless you decide to use LLD, which is horribly broken on MIPS.
The
mips64-unknown-linux-muslabi64
target is currently rather broken, but I'm working on getting it fixed so that it can at least be used again.While I can't commit to maintaining the LLVM side of this target, I don't mind looking into any other MIPS or musl-related issues that arise with this target.
See e.g. #143409 for some rustc fixes I have in the pipeline and rust-lang/libc#4509, rust-lang/libc#4527, rust-lang/libc#4528, rust-lang/libc#4529, rust-lang/libc#4530 for fixing the libc definitions for this target.
I'm adding myself as a maintainer mostly due to this interaction.
LLVM support has been a concern for these targets in the past, but it shouldn't hurt to have a nominal maintainer for these even if they remain tier 3. From my experience, LLVM for MIPS is working well nowadays unless you decide to use LLD, which is horribly broken on MIPS.