-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
Initialize mingw for the runner's user #144196
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@bors2 try jobs=mingw,msvc |
Initialize mingw for the runner's user This is apparently the more proper fix to https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/242791-t-infra/topic/Spurious.20bors.20CI.20failures/near/528915775 But let's see if it works. try-job: *mingw* try-job: *msvc*
💔 Test failed
|
@bors2 try jobs=x86_64-mingw-,i686-mingw-,msvc |
Initialize mingw for the runner's user This is apparently the more proper fix to https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/242791-t-infra/topic/Spurious.20bors.20CI.20failures/near/528915775 But let's see if it works. try-job: x86_64-mingw- try-job: i686-mingw- try-job: msvc
💔 Test failed
|
@bors2 try jobs=x86_64-mingw-,i686-mingw-,msvc |
Initialize mingw for the runner's user This is apparently the more proper fix to https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/242791-t-infra/topic/Spurious.20bors.20CI.20failures/near/528915775 But let's see if it works. try-job: *x86_64-mingw-* try-job: *i686-mingw-* try-job: *msvc*
💔 Test failed
|
@bors2 try jobs=x86_64-mingw-,msvc |
Initialize mingw for the runner's user This is apparently the more proper fix to https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/242791-t-infra/topic/Spurious.20bors.20CI.20failures/near/528915775 But let's see if it works. try-job: *x86_64-mingw-* try-job: *msvc*
I think these two should be equivalent. Once the directory is created the setup code should run in the next job... ...unless GitHub messed up the users again. Anyway r=me for the current implementation once it passes CI. |
Fair enough. This is at least contained in the mingw script, so that's somewhat nicer. r? mati865 |
Initialize mingw for the runner's user This is apparently the more proper fix to https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/242791-t-infra/topic/Spurious.20bors.20CI.20failures/near/528915775 But let's see if it works.
Initialize mingw for the runner's user This is apparently the more proper fix to https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/242791-t-infra/topic/Spurious.20bors.20CI.20failures/near/528915775 But let's see if it works.
Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - #141260 (Allow volatile access to non-Rust memory, including address 0) - #143604 (Stabilize `const_float_round_methods`) - #143833 (Ban projecting into SIMD types [MCP838]) - #143988 ([rustdoc] Make aliases search support partial matching) - #144078 (Fix debuginfo-lto-alloc.rs test) - #144111 (Remove deprecated `MaybeUninit` slice methods) - #144116 (Fixes for LLVM 21) - #144134 (Cleanup unicode table gen) - #144142 (Add implicit sized bound to trait ascription types) - #144148 (Remove pretty print hack for async blocks) - #144169 (interpret: fix TypeId pointers being considered data pointers) - #144196 (Initialize mingw for the runner's user) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - #141260 (Allow volatile access to non-Rust memory, including address 0) - #143604 (Stabilize `const_float_round_methods`) - #143988 ([rustdoc] Make aliases search support partial matching) - #144078 (Fix debuginfo-lto-alloc.rs test) - #144111 (Remove deprecated `MaybeUninit` slice methods) - #144116 (Fixes for LLVM 21) - #144134 (Cleanup unicode table gen) - #144142 (Add implicit sized bound to trait ascription types) - #144148 (Remove pretty print hack for async blocks) - #144169 (interpret: fix TypeId pointers being considered data pointers) - #144196 (Initialize mingw for the runner's user) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of #144196 - ChrisDenton:init-mingw, r=mati865 Initialize mingw for the runner's user This is apparently the more proper fix to https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/242791-t-infra/topic/Spurious.20bors.20CI.20failures/near/528915775 But let's see if it works.
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#141260 (Allow volatile access to non-Rust memory, including address 0) - rust-lang/rust#143604 (Stabilize `const_float_round_methods`) - rust-lang/rust#143988 ([rustdoc] Make aliases search support partial matching) - rust-lang/rust#144078 (Fix debuginfo-lto-alloc.rs test) - rust-lang/rust#144111 (Remove deprecated `MaybeUninit` slice methods) - rust-lang/rust#144116 (Fixes for LLVM 21) - rust-lang/rust#144134 (Cleanup unicode table gen) - rust-lang/rust#144142 (Add implicit sized bound to trait ascription types) - rust-lang/rust#144148 (Remove pretty print hack for async blocks) - rust-lang/rust#144169 (interpret: fix TypeId pointers being considered data pointers) - rust-lang/rust#144196 (Initialize mingw for the runner's user) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Initialize mingw for the runner's user This is apparently the more proper fix to https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/242791-t-infra/topic/Spurious.20bors.20CI.20failures/near/528915775 But let's see if it works.
…iaskrgr Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#141260 (Allow volatile access to non-Rust memory, including address 0) - rust-lang#143604 (Stabilize `const_float_round_methods`) - rust-lang#143988 ([rustdoc] Make aliases search support partial matching) - rust-lang#144078 (Fix debuginfo-lto-alloc.rs test) - rust-lang#144111 (Remove deprecated `MaybeUninit` slice methods) - rust-lang#144116 (Fixes for LLVM 21) - rust-lang#144134 (Cleanup unicode table gen) - rust-lang#144142 (Add implicit sized bound to trait ascription types) - rust-lang#144148 (Remove pretty print hack for async blocks) - rust-lang#144169 (interpret: fix TypeId pointers being considered data pointers) - rust-lang#144196 (Initialize mingw for the runner's user) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This is apparently the more proper fix to https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/242791-t-infra/topic/Spurious.20bors.20CI.20failures/near/528915775
But let's see if it works.