Release uefi-macros-0.9.0, uefi-0.18.0, and uefi-services-0.15.0

[phip1611]

Hey, I'm not sure about our release process and how we plan to release certain versions. But I just noticed that we already have lots of new and changed functionality since 0.17.0 written down in the Changelog. Do we want to publish everything as 0.18.0 before the next release gets way too big (breaking changes etc)?

@nicholasbishop @GabrielMajeri

[nicholasbishop]

I agree it's about time for a release, I can take care of that early next week, maybe Tuesday.

[phip1611]

Very nice! I'm already having enough ideas for breaking changes for 0.19 😈 😄

[GabrielMajeri]

I'm not sure about our release process and how we plan to release certain versions

We don't have a well-defined release schedule, we publish new versions whenever we feel like it and get around to doing it 😆 that being said, we do have a well-documented release publishing process.

@phip1611 would you like to be added as an owner on the crates.io packages as well, so that you can also publish new versions of the crates?

[phip1611]

@GabrielMajeri if you don't mind, sure.

[GabrielMajeri]

@GabrielMajeri if you don't mind, sure.

Done, you should be able to see some owner invites in your inbox now.

[phip1611]

Thanks! Crates.io sent me 4x the same email, tho 😂

[GabrielMajeri]

Thanks! Crates.io sent me 4x the same email, tho 😂

Weird, there should've been four different invites for the four crates we have (uefi, uefi-macros, uefi-services and ucs2). Did you manage to accept each one of them?

[phip1611]

Ah, now I have all invitations. But some of those were sent multiple times.

[phip1611]

From #534 (comment) I've found that we can also safely bump the MSRV with the next release, as enough time has passed. 🎉

[phip1611]

Ah, @GabrielMajeri , I just noticed that you invited everyone individually

Perhaps, it also might be smart to invite rustos-dev/uefi? Or is there any downside? As done here for the multiboot2 crate:

[nicholasbishop]

Release done :)