Maybe typo? #17
Description
From the doc of Volatile::new
While it is possible to construct Volatile instances from arbitrary values (including non-reference values), most of the methods are only available when the wrapped type is a reference. The only reason that we don't forbid non-reference types in the constructor functions is that the Rust compiler does not support trait bounds on generic const functions yet. When this becomes possible, we will release a new version of this library with removed support for non-references. For these reasons it is not recommended to use the Volatile type only with references.
Should the last sentence be "For these reasons it is recommended to use the Volatile type only with references."? (remove not)