Skip to content

Update tiny_stack_allocator.c #15

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 8, 2025
Merged

Conversation

RebbePod
Copy link
Contributor

@RebbePod RebbePod commented Apr 8, 2025

I am trying to use this as a library for esphome I think this will fix an error I'm getting

../tiny/src/tiny_stack_allocator.c:16:5: error: unknown type name 'max_align_t'
     max_align_t data[max(_size, sizeof(max_align_t)) / sizeof(max_align_t)];          \
     ^~~~~~~~~~~
../tiny/src/tiny_stack_allocator.c:21:1: note: in expansion of macro 'define_worker'
 define_worker(8);
 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
../tiny/src/tiny_stack_allocator.c:16:40: error: 'max_align_t' undeclared (first use in this function)
     max_align_t data[max(_size, sizeof(max_align_t)) / sizeof(max_align_t)];          \

I am trying to use this as a library for esphome I think this will fix an error I'm getting

```
src/tiny_stack_allocator.c:16:5: error: unknown type name 'max_align_t'
     max_align_t data[max(_size, sizeof(max_align_t)) / sizeof(max_align_t)];```
@ryanplusplus
Copy link
Owner

Thanks!

@ryanplusplus ryanplusplus merged commit 7f820d0 into ryanplusplus:main Apr 8, 2025
5 checks passed
@RebbePod
Copy link
Contributor Author

RebbePod commented Apr 8, 2025

@ryanplusplus It appears that didn't help, any idea why I'm getting that error?

@ryanplusplus
Copy link
Owner

Could be that an older C standard is used. This requires C11. I can rewrite this to not require it.

@RebbePod
Copy link
Contributor Author

RebbePod commented Apr 8, 2025

Ok that would be great.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants