Skip to content

🍒 [lldb][Expression] Allow specifying a preferred ModuleList for lookup during expression evaluation #10312

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 21, 2025

Conversation

Michael137
Copy link

The TestMemoryHistory.py/TestReportData.py are currently failing on
the x86 macOS CI (started after we upgraded the Xcode SDK on that
machien). The LLDB ASAN utility expression is failing to run with
following error:

(lldb) image lookup -n __asan_get_alloc_stack
1 match found in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_sanitizers.dylib:
        Address: libsystem_sanitizers.dylib[0x00007ffd11e673f7] (libsystem_sanitizers.dylib.__TEXT.__text + 11287)
        Summary: libsystem_sanitizers.dylib`__asan_get_alloc_stack
1 match found in /Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/clang/21/lib/darwin/libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:
        Address: libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib[0x0000000000009ec0] (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib.__TEXT.__text + 34352)
        Summary: libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::__asan_get_alloc_stack(__sanitizer::uptr, __sanitizer::uptr *, __sanitizer::uptr, __sanitizer::u32 *) at asan_debugging.cpp:132
(lldb) memory history 'pointer'
Assertion failed: ((uintptr_t)addr == report.access.address), function __asan_get_alloc_stack, file debugger_abi.cpp, line 62.
warning: cannot evaluate AddressSanitizer expression:
error: Expression execution was interrupted: signal SIGABRT.
The process has been returned to the state before expression evaluation.

The reason for this is that the system sanitizer dylib and the locally
built libclang_rt contain the same symbol __asan_get_alloc_stack, and
depending on the order in which they're loaded, we may pick the one from
the wrong dylib (this probably changed during the buildbot upgrade and
is why it only now started failing). Based on discussion with @wrotki we
always want to pick the one that's in the libclang_rt dylib if it was
loaded, and libsystem_sanitizers otherwise.

This patch addresses this by adding a "preferred lookup context list" to
the expression evaluator. Currently this is only exposed in the
EvaluateExpressionOptions. We make it a SymbolContextList in case we
want the lookup contexts to be contexts other than modules (e.g., source
files, etc.). In IRExecutionUnit we make it a ModuleList because it
makes the symbol lookup implementation simpler and we only do module
lookups here anyway. If we ever need it to be a SymbolContext, that
transformation shouldn't be too difficult.

(cherry picked from commit 542d52b)

rdar://144997976

… during expression evaluation (llvm#129733)

The `TestMemoryHistory.py`/`TestReportData.py` are currently failing on
the x86 macOS CI (started after we upgraded the Xcode SDK on that
machien). The LLDB ASAN utility expression is failing to run with
following error:
```
(lldb) image lookup -n __asan_get_alloc_stack
1 match found in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_sanitizers.dylib:
        Address: libsystem_sanitizers.dylib[0x00007ffd11e673f7] (libsystem_sanitizers.dylib.__TEXT.__text + 11287)
        Summary: libsystem_sanitizers.dylib`__asan_get_alloc_stack
1 match found in /Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/clang/21/lib/darwin/libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:
        Address: libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib[0x0000000000009ec0] (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib.__TEXT.__text + 34352)
        Summary: libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::__asan_get_alloc_stack(__sanitizer::uptr, __sanitizer::uptr *, __sanitizer::uptr, __sanitizer::u32 *) at asan_debugging.cpp:132
(lldb) memory history 'pointer'
Assertion failed: ((uintptr_t)addr == report.access.address), function __asan_get_alloc_stack, file debugger_abi.cpp, line 62.
warning: cannot evaluate AddressSanitizer expression:
error: Expression execution was interrupted: signal SIGABRT.
The process has been returned to the state before expression evaluation.
```

The reason for this is that the system sanitizer dylib and the locally
built libclang_rt contain the same symbol `__asan_get_alloc_stack`, and
depending on the order in which they're loaded, we may pick the one from
the wrong dylib (this probably changed during the buildbot upgrade and
is why it only now started failing). Based on discussion with @wrotki we
always want to pick the one that's in the libclang_rt dylib if it was
loaded, and libsystem_sanitizers otherwise.

This patch addresses this by adding a "preferred lookup context list" to
the expression evaluator. Currently this is only exposed in the
`EvaluateExpressionOptions`. We make it a `SymbolContextList` in case we
want the lookup contexts to be contexts other than modules (e.g., source
files, etc.). In `IRExecutionUnit` we make it a `ModuleList` because it
makes the symbol lookup implementation simpler and we only do module
lookups here anyway. If we ever need it to be a `SymbolContext`, that
transformation shouldn't be too difficult.

(cherry picked from commit 542d52b)
These are macOS tests only and are currently failing on the x86_64 CI
and on arm64 on recent versions of macOS/Xcode.

The tests are failing because we're stopping in:
```
Process 17458 stopped
* thread #1: tid = 0xbda69a, 0x00000002735bd000
  libsystem_malloc.dylib`purgeable_print_self.cold.1, stop reason = EXC_BREAKPOINT (code=1, subcode=0x2735bd000)
```
instead of the libsanitizers library. This seems to be related to
`-fsanitize-trivial-abi` support

Skip these for now until we figure out the root cause.

(cherry picked from commit 6cc8b0b)
@Michael137 Michael137 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 20, 2025 23:53
@Michael137
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci test

@Michael137 Michael137 merged commit 0c3c73e into stable/20240723 Mar 21, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
@Michael137 Michael137 deleted the lldb/sanitizer-test-fixes-to-20240723 branch March 21, 2025 10:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant