Skip to content

[Function builders] Align buildDo() implementation with the pitch. #32100

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 31, 2020

Conversation

DougGregor
Copy link
Member

Rather than passing the result of buildBlock() into buildDo(), follow
the (better) design from the function builders pitch by passing in the
components from the block directly into buildDo(). This means that
buildDo() will need to take separate parameters for each component,
but allows buildDo() to treat the components separately.

Rather than passing the result of buildBlock() into buildDo(), follow
the (better) design from the function builders pitch by passing in the
components from the block directly into buildDo(). This means that
buildDo() will need to take separate parameters for each component,
but allows buildDo() to treat the components separately.
@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci smoke test

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please smoke test

1 similar comment
@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please smoke test

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci smoke test Windows

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci smoke test Linux

1 similar comment
@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci smoke test Linux

@compnerd
Copy link
Member

Its the same s-p-m issue that has been cropping up

@compnerd
Copy link
Member

@swift-ci please smoke test Linux platform

@DougGregor DougGregor merged commit 2f62eb8 into swiftlang:master May 31, 2020
@DougGregor DougGregor deleted the function-builders-do-block branch May 31, 2020 05:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants