Skip to content

Allow customization of the subscript operator for triton values #7239

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Anstow
Copy link
Contributor

@Anstow Anstow commented Jun 19, 2025

This allows users to provide custom setitem and getitem functions in order to override the subscript operator for their triton classes.

New contributor declaration

  • I am not making a trivial change, such as fixing a typo in a comment.

  • I have written a PR description following these
    rules.

  • I have run pre-commit run --from-ref origin/main --to-ref HEAD.

  • Select one of the following.

    • I have added tests.
      • /test for lit tests
      • /unittest for C++ tests
      • /python/test for end-to-end tests
    • This PR does not need a test because FILL THIS IN.
  • Select one of the following.

    • I have not added any lit tests.
    • The lit tests I have added follow these best practices,
      including the "tests should be minimal" section. (Usually running Python code
      and using the instructions it generates is not minimal.)

@Anstow Anstow requested a review from ptillet as a code owner June 19, 2025 14:15
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ def __iter__(self):
def __call__(self, *args, **kwds):
return self.value(*args, **kwds)

def __getitem__(self, *args):
def __getitem__(self, *args, _semantic=None):
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The alternative to adding these here is to add a check in call_Function (formerly visit_Call) to only add a _semantic argument if it's used like what is done for _generator. The more I think about this the more I like it but I'd like to get other people opinions before changing it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant