Skip to content

db: consider possibility of NextVaultRotation being unset on queue population (VAULT-35639) #30320

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Apr 28, 2025

Conversation

elliesterner
Copy link
Contributor

@elliesterner elliesterner commented Apr 22, 2025

Description

NextVaultRotation was introduced to the static role struct in Vault 1.15.0. In 1.19.0, vault changed to use this field to determine when to enqueue roles for rotation here. However, if a static role was originally created on a version older than 1.15.0, it won’t have a NextVaultRotation value set. After upgrading to 1.19.0 or above, vault sees this value as the zero value (time.Time{}) and rotates the cred immediately.

TODO only if you're a HashiCorp employee

  • Backport Labels: If this fix needs to be backported, use the appropriate backport/ label that matches the desired release branch. Note that in the CE repo, the latest release branch will look like backport/x.x.x, but older release branches will be backport/ent/x.x.x+ent.
    • LTS: If this fixes a critical security vulnerability or severity 1 bug, it will also need to be backported to the current LTS versions of Vault. To ensure this, use all available enterprise labels.
  • ENT Breakage: If this PR either 1) removes a public function OR 2) changes the signature
    of a public function, even if that change is in a CE file, double check that
    applying the patch for this PR to the ENT repo and running tests doesn't
    break any tests. Sometimes ENT only tests rely on public functions in CE
    files.
  • Jira: If this change has an associated Jira, it's referenced either
    in the PR description, commit message, or branch name.
  • RFC: If this change has an associated RFC, please link it in the description.
  • ENT PR: If this change has an associated ENT PR, please link it in the
    description. Also, make sure the changelog is in this PR, not in your ENT PR.

@elliesterner elliesterner requested a review from a team as a code owner April 22, 2025 15:27
@github-actions github-actions bot added the hashicorp-contributed-pr If the PR is HashiCorp (i.e. not-community) contributed label Apr 22, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 22, 2025

CI Results:
All Go tests succeeded! ✅

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 22, 2025

Build Results:
All builds succeeded! ✅

@elliesterner elliesterner changed the title consider possibility of NextVaultRotation being nil on queue population db: consider possibility of NextVaultRotation being nil on queue population Apr 22, 2025
@elliesterner elliesterner changed the title db: consider possibility of NextVaultRotation being nil on queue population db: consider possibility of NextVaultRotation being nil on queue population (#179105) Apr 22, 2025
@elliesterner elliesterner requested a review from a team as a code owner April 22, 2025 17:31
@elliesterner elliesterner requested a review from j--w April 22, 2025 17:31
@elliesterner elliesterner modified the milestones: 1.19.3, 1.20.0-rc Apr 22, 2025
@elliesterner elliesterner changed the title db: consider possibility of NextVaultRotation being nil on queue population (#179105) db: consider possibility of NextVaultRotation being unset on queue population (#179105) Apr 23, 2025
@elliesterner elliesterner changed the title db: consider possibility of NextVaultRotation being unset on queue population (#179105) db: consider possibility of NextVaultRotation being unset on queue population (VAULT-35639) Apr 24, 2025
@elliesterner elliesterner requested a review from benashz April 25, 2025 04:06
Copy link
Contributor

@benashz benashz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few more suggestions/comments for you, otherwise this PR is looking good!

@elliesterner elliesterner requested a review from benashz April 25, 2025 16:01
@elliesterner elliesterner requested a review from benashz April 28, 2025 14:41
Copy link
Contributor

@benashz benashz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@elliesterner elliesterner added backport/ent/1.18.x+ent backport/ent/1.17.x+ent Changes are backported to 1.17.x+ent backport/ent/1.16.x+ent Changes are backported to 1.16.x+ent labels Apr 28, 2025
@elliesterner elliesterner merged commit 294c304 into main Apr 28, 2025
106 of 107 checks passed
@elliesterner elliesterner deleted the elliesterner/check-for-zero-nvr-on-queue-population branch April 28, 2025 21:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/ent/1.16.x+ent Changes are backported to 1.16.x+ent backport/ent/1.17.x+ent Changes are backported to 1.17.x+ent backport/ent/1.18.x+ent hashicorp-contributed-pr If the PR is HashiCorp (i.e. not-community) contributed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants