Skip to content

Added include and exclude params for coverage reports (issue #6) #57

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Added include and exclude params for coverage reports (issue #6) #57

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

justedro
Copy link

Fixes #6

@justedro
Copy link
Author

Someone pls fix the builds

.run(conn);
.skipCompatibilityCheck(skipCompatibilityCheck);

for (String includeObject: finalIncludeObjectsList){
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be done in Fluent interface manner to stay within the same pattern. Will need a change in Java API. I will try to do this soon.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your efforts, though! Very appreciated!

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean create a function like "includeObjects" or something like that? I also can do that, in general, if you are busy now.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, creating a function in the TestRunner class, return the TestRunner instance so we can continue to use fluent interface pattern. The need to create a loop outside just to add objects feels uncomfortable to me :)

@pesse
Copy link
Member

pesse commented Dec 30, 2017

I recreated the PR here to get around the travis problems: #58

@pesse pesse closed this Dec 30, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants