Skip to content

librustdoc house-keeping 🧹 #143155

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 29, 2025
Merged

Conversation

yotamofek
Copy link
Contributor

This PR mostly removes a bunch of crate-level attributes that were added at some point, but then later on became unnecessary:

  • some #[feature] gates
  • some #[allow]s
  • a #[recursion_limit]

Then I went ahead and sprinkled some tidy sorting on the remaining attrs, and Cargo.toml.

Trying to give my anal retentiveness some peace of mind 😅

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 28, 2025

r? @GuillaumeGomez

rustbot has assigned @GuillaumeGomez.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 28, 2025
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks! 🤣

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 28, 2025

📌 Commit 581cb11 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 28, 2025
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2025
…compiler-errors

Remove unused feature gates

After finding some unused feature gates in rust-lang#143155 , I wrote a small script to see if I can find any others.
And I did. Not a lot, but still a small win 😁
Contains a few instances of `iter_from_coroutine` that can be removed due to rust-lang#142801 (I guess).
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2025
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #142021 (Doc: clarify priority of lint level sources)
 - #142367 (Add regression test for #137857 to ensure that we generate intra doc links for extern crate items.)
 - #142641 (Generate symbols.o for proc-macros too)
 - #142889 (Clarify doc comment on unix OpenOptions)
 - #143063 (explain `ImportData::imported_module`)
 - #143088 (Improve documentation of `TagEncoding`)
 - #143135 (fix typos on some doc comments)
 - #143138 (Port `#[link_name]` to the new attribute parsing infrastructure)
 - #143155 (`librustdoc` house-keeping 🧹)
 - #143169 (Remove unused feature gates)
 - #143171 (Fix the span of trait bound modifier `[const]`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 8dbc25c into rust-lang:master Jun 29, 2025
10 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.90.0 milestone Jun 29, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2025
Rollup merge of #143169 - yotamofek:pr/unneeded-features, r=compiler-errors

Remove unused feature gates

After finding some unused feature gates in #143155 , I wrote a small script to see if I can find any others.
And I did. Not a lot, but still a small win 😁
Contains a few instances of `iter_from_coroutine` that can be removed due to #142801 (I guess).
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2025
Rollup merge of #143155 - yotamofek:pr/rustdoc/housekeeping, r=GuillaumeGomez

`librustdoc` house-keeping 🧹

This PR mostly removes a bunch of crate-level attributes that were added at some point, but then later on became unnecessary:
- some `#[feature]` gates
- some `#[allow]`s
- a `#[recursion_limit]`

Then I went ahead and sprinkled some tidy sorting on the remaining attrs, and `Cargo.toml`.

Trying to give my anal retentiveness some peace of mind 😅
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants